- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Renderings of expansion from LSU
Posted on 4/18/12 at 12:42 pm to winnining
Posted on 4/18/12 at 12:42 pm to winnining
glad i'm not the only one who has issues with the outside.
here's some problems i have with it
those arched windows at the top are too short and squatty looking. i also hate the enormous flat surface above them. And the corner where it meets the west deck looks to disjointed.
here's some problems i have with it
those arched windows at the top are too short and squatty looking. i also hate the enormous flat surface above them. And the corner where it meets the west deck looks to disjointed.
Posted on 4/18/12 at 12:46 pm to Roberteaux
and while i'm at it, i'm gonna pimp the design that i did a few weeks back for those who didn't see it...
Posted on 4/18/12 at 12:48 pm to Roberteaux
I agree, but another picture has it looking correct
Posted on 4/18/12 at 2:00 pm to Roberteaux
quote:
glad i'm not the only one who has issues with the outside.
here's some problems i have with it Image Link
those arched windows at the top are too short and squatty looking. i also hate the enormous flat surface above them. And the corner where it meets the west deck looks to disjointed.
VERY same concerns. the top is silly looking. it's a poor imitation of the original. here are the two end zones side-by-side. concession stands stick out at the top. the glassed in ramp makes absolutely zero sense.
Comparison Pic
ETA: I don't come on here to complain. I actually like the recent additions unlike a lot of other people. And I was happy that there would be arches in the new design. However, the arches aren't real arches nor do they make sense with the extra 20 feet of building above it.
This post was edited on 4/18/12 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 4/18/12 at 2:33 pm to Roberteaux
I'm happy they are expanding Tiger Stadium but he proposed design blows. This design is too disjointed in many places. It looks like they have taken four sections of four different stadiums and hodge podged them together. We can do better, much better.
This post was edited on 4/18/12 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 4/18/12 at 3:36 pm to Roberteaux
In one of the renderings, the arches look much better. They are bordered by parapet walls on either side instead of between every 2nd arch.
There are two different designs. Only one looks good even though both have the stupid glass atrium.
The one with the people drawn in looks stupid.
For the record, I'm in the camp that thinks the east and west upper decks both look stupid because of their lack of design continunity with the older lower decks that they covered up.
There are two different designs. Only one looks good even though both have the stupid glass atrium.
The one with the people drawn in looks stupid.
For the record, I'm in the camp that thinks the east and west upper decks both look stupid because of their lack of design continunity with the older lower decks that they covered up.
This post was edited on 4/18/12 at 3:39 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)