- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Offensive Tackle.......Tevin Lawson?
Posted on 4/17/12 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 4/17/12 at 12:08 pm
Saw on 247 where Tevin Lawson is an OT.
Makes sense to me since there are no top OT looking at us (besides Tunsil).
WIth Gilmore, Manning and Lacoutre looking at us for DT, can you see Lawson being a Right Tackle?
Makes sense to me since there are no top OT looking at us (besides Tunsil).
WIth Gilmore, Manning and Lacoutre looking at us for DT, can you see Lawson being a Right Tackle?
5
Posted on 4/17/12 at 12:09 pm to dstone12
No, I think DT all the way. If he does play OL it will probably be at OG.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 12:19 pm to dstone12
Maybe at RT. I can definitely see him being an OL.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 12:21 pm to Gravitiger
Agree. His 1st shot will be DT unless we load up at DT and strikeout at OT. Both are possible but still side with DT being his 1st landing spot
Posted on 4/17/12 at 4:14 pm to lsufanva
i think he's a dt all the way.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 4:20 pm to tigerblood29
quote:
i think he's a dt all the way.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 4:20 pm to dstone12
Dt if we miss out on Manning.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 4:47 pm to LSU RAMPAGE24
I don't think Manning has anything to do with it. Lawson was apparently not on the radar until he moved from OL to DT; then he very quickly received a commitable offer. I don't know why they'd offer him at DT when they never really considered him at OL, if they really thought he'd eventually move to OL.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 5:13 pm to LSU RAMPAGE24
quote:
Dt if we miss out on Manning.
Him playing DT for us has absolutely nothing to do with Manning.
He has only played DT for one season in High School and will be a great DT in our scheme when he learns the position.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 5:50 pm to LaBornNRaised
If you watch his film on Hudl, a good bit of it is at offensive tackle and it's pretty impressive.
This guy is just a really good big athlete. You can play him anywhere on the line of scrimmage and he'll do well.
This guy is just a really good big athlete. You can play him anywhere on the line of scrimmage and he'll do well.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 6:57 pm to macaoidh
Agree. Has great long term potential at DT but the versatility to play OL if that fits best in the future. Never know with these kids until they're on campus and the coaches see them compete against kids bigger and stronger than them. Gutcheck. i do like him more as a DT though. We've got plenty of guys similar in size and skill on the OL.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 8:44 pm to dstone12
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/17/12 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 4/17/12 at 8:50 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
He has only played DT for one season in High School and will be a great DT in our scheme when he learns the position.
Exactly he has only played DT... Do not understand the reasoning behind his offer...
He has only played DT for one season in High School and will be a great DT in our scheme when he learns the position.
Exactly he has only played DT... Do not understand the reasoning behind his offer...
Posted on 4/17/12 at 10:03 pm to dstone12
Dude played half a season at dt and blew it up. Very raw as a dt. Coaches want him at dt, but no telling after a couple years.
Posted on 4/17/12 at 10:12 pm to lsufanva
quote:
His 1st shot will be DT unless we load up at DT and strikeout at OT. Both are possible but still side with DT being his 1st landing spot
this.... he will be given a shot only at DT if we don't get all the DLmen we are targeting this year 1.) because they would be better and he wouldn't see the field at DL and 2.) because he's more versatile to be able to switch as opposed to the other guy's we'd be bringing in....
so basically, he's a DT, unless we get higher rated DT's, in which case we'll Barksdale him....
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News