re: Teabagger in court today

quote:

---

Whether the DA decides to pursue that crime and/or to the fullest extent is an entirely different issue. But more than one person in this thread stated or suggested that this was not a sexual crime, when it clearly is under the law.

---

My point entirely. yes, it meets the elements of the crime that is named "sexual battery" by our legislature, but i contend that the act was not sexual in nature. I do not believe that this a-hole is a sexual predator, based on what he did, and i think it would be unfair of us to make him wear the label "sex offender" and register as such for the rest of his life.

I believe he should pay a price, and he already has paid substantially. But I think the penalty of "sex offender" is much too great for the crime. i don't always post in threads, but when i do, you should get the frick over it.