Started By
Message

re: Let's be honest here, do some of yall "dislike" Jerrard Randall because he's

Posted on 3/3/12 at 3:33 pm to
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 3/3/12 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Also to answer your question Michael Vick.

Mike Vick was such a great leader he gave up well over $100 million in contract/endorsements so he could fight dogs. Oh that landed him in federal prison as well.

quote:

Others may not have a neck tattoo but very visible sleeve and hand tattoos ie derek rose.

I never said anything about tats anywhere else but the neck. You cannot possibly try to argue the fact that if a person has a neck tat they are much much more inclined to be a dumbass.
Its really not even a debate.

If Randall turns out to be a good leader and decision maker than that is great. But it doesnt change the fact that he would be an example of the exception and not the rule.
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30428 posts
Posted on 3/3/12 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

You cannot possibly try to argue the fact that if a person has a neck tat they are much much more inclined to be a dumbass.
Its really not even a debate.
quote:

You cannot possibly try to argue the fact that if a person has a neck tat they are much much more inclined to be a dumbass.
Its really not even a debate.



I hope you are trolling because this is stupid. Please link some studies that prove this asinine theory. Your opinion on neck tats being trashy does not make it fact.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32188 posts
Posted on 3/3/12 at 3:39 pm to
quote:


Mike Vick was such a great leader he gave up well over $100 million in contract/endorsements so he could fight dogs. Oh that landed him in federal prison as well.



You asked for a good qb who has a neck tattoo. Vick is a good qb and probably top 5 college qb of all time.

quote:

Others may not have a neck tattoo but very visible sleeve and hand tattoos ie derek rose.

I never said anything about tats anywhere else but the neck. You cannot possibly try to argue the fact that if a person has a neck tat they are much much more inclined to be a dumbass.
Its really not even a debate.



Yeah because having a neck tattoo is so much dumbe of a decision than



You cant cover any of those up theres no difference in health risk...I really dont get your point. The only "questionable decision making" about a neck tat compared to a chest tat is you cant cover it up for business etc. But you also cant cover up large hand tattoos etc. and there are PLENTY of examples of leaders with those.
This post was edited on 3/3/12 at 3:44 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram