- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:18 pm to LSUQ
When are we going to find out the Wonderlic score for everybody's favorite QB?
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:19 pm to LSUlunatic
Architecture... don't confuse the two.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:22 pm to TXGunslinger10
we won't he fricking ate the test then said i did great
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:22 pm to LSUlunatic
quote:
Luck has a 3.9 in engineering at Stanford. Somehow I don't believe this.
I am not sure how in the hell some of you are coming to these conclusions. He seems pretty intelligent to me. Maybe Brockers is just sharp in his own right.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:26 pm to ForeverLSU02
quote:
Michael Brockers outscored Andrew Luck on the Wonderlic @ NFL Combine...
Luck has been at Stanford for four years.
This is an incredible achievement for Brockers.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:33 pm to tigerblood29
quote:
we won't he fricking ate the test then said i did great
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:33 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Not even sure why they test D linemen. You could score a 5 on the wonderlic and it wouldn't matter.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:39 pm to GFunk
quote:
The Wonderlic measures a player’s learning and problem solving ability, helping teams to determine if a possible draft pick has the skills to learn the playbook and make decisions – both of which are critical on the field. Higher scores mean higher thinking ability, and that has an impact on team leadership, playing style and overall results.
The average scores reported for positions are:
Offensive Tackles: 26
Centers: 25
Quarterbacks: 24
Guards: 23
Tight Ends: 22
Safeties: 19
Middle Linebackers: 19
Cornerbacks: 18
Wide Receivers: 17
Fullbacks: 17
Halfbacks: 16
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:46 pm to tigerblood29
quote:
we won't he fricking ate the test then said i did great
It will probably be higher than the rant expects leading to another meltdown.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:47 pm to Drew Orleans
quote:
Architecture... don't confuse the two.
Stanford doesn't offer architecture. He's in some hybrid program that's like architecture, but if he ever wants to practice he'll have to take some other classes elsewhere.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:51 pm to GFunk
FWIW there are no results on google right now for Luck's wonderlic score. This thread is the only thing that comes up.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:01 pm to GFunk
quote:
104.5 FM in Baton Rouge were discussing it.
They also said it was going to rain the other day.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:16 pm to GFunk
calling bullshite
How did a local Baton Rouge radio program get the scores before anyone else?
How did a local Baton Rouge radio program get the scores before anyone else?
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:28 pm to GFunk
I have staunchly tauted Brockers as a top 10 pick this year as soon as it was announced he was even thinking about leaving. But he can't have done himself any favors with his bench/ 40 combo. Especially compared to that DT from Memphis who dominated both. A great Wondelic would be impressive, but I don't thnk it makes up for his other scores.
He's still a beast and will be a top 10-15 pick no doubt, but I'm not sure the combine helped him all that much.
He's still a beast and will be a top 10-15 pick no doubt, but I'm not sure the combine helped him all that much.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:29 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:
That's not very impressive considering that Luck is a Cro-Magnon.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:34 pm to LSUlunatic
quote:
Luck has a 3.9 in engineering at Stanford. Somehow I don't believe this.
Really? I thought he was an architecture major for some reason
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:36 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
I have staunchly tauted Brockers as a top 10 pick this year as soon as it was announced he was even thinking about leaving. But he can't have done himself any favors with his bench/ 40 combo. Especially compared to that DT from Memphis who dominated both. A great Wondelic would be impressive, but I don't thnk it makes up for his other scores.
He's still a beast and will be a top 10-15 pick no doubt, but I'm not sure the combine helped him all that much.
It probably didn't help but Poe's career production is pretty bad and that's against crappy CUSA competition. Once people start looking at the tape again Brockers will be fine.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 5:27 pm to saintsfan22
I agree Brockers is the better prospect and should be drafted higher, but Poe actually has fairly comparable production to Brockers, especially considering consistency over a career, role in their particular defense, and the types of offenses they were facing.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News