re: NCAA Football 13

quote:

---

They are very common, hence the videos I've posted.

In the red zone, they are just amazingly frequent.

---

You posted seven videos. Four of them were in the summer of 2011. That's approximately 4-5 months prior to the latest patch. So those are out.

The other three pertained to "psychic DBs" and the "broken FB." The psychic DBs do occur, but, AGAIN, with the patch and adjusted sliders, their reaction times are decreased. Hence, a better experience.

The broken FB video, by the way, is garbage. The USER immediately broke the run to the outside instead of following his "broken FB." If you watch the play, a huge, gaping hole opens up on the right side, WHERE THE PLAY WAS DESIGNED. But due to his FB not breaking outside with the user, all of a sudden, he is broken. The FB went with the play, the user didn't. Broken user IMO.

quote:

---

Why not, it is a realistic part of the experience, why stop the tedium at recruiting?

If your argument is that recruiting tedium is "part of the realism", that is. . .

---

I was referring to the tedium and realism of recruiting, buddy. And you very well know that.

But, if we want to play your game...

quote:

---

Oh, so we should stick to the confines of only the framework you wish. Don't expound on the point at all.

---

We very well could go balls to the wall and just incorporate all kinds of useless actions and events to really bog down your time. Hell, why not have weekly player meetings, video breakdown of the opposing defense, contract negotiations during the season, gossip at the office water cooler with Sherrie the Secretary, feed Mike the Tiger on Wednesdays, brainstorming your next pep talk, a morning jog and bang the wife at night? Sounds good, right?

And on that realism, in relation to the psychic DBs, maybe their teammates are yelling from the sideline about the pass, eh? Telling him when the ball was thrown and where? I mean, if you want to go down the road of realism... F* it. Let's toss in piss balloons and poisoning tress.

The point of staying within the framework is to focus the conversation so it can conclude. Or, we can do it your way and begin incorporating semi-related topics in hopes of bolstering our respective arguments, taking us further out into the wilderness and further from finishing the conversation, like women do when they get into fights. I, rather, prefer to stay on topic. Whatever floats your boat.

quote:

---

You must be fun to talk to. . .

---

Actually, yes. And your condescending posts do nothing but discredit your arguments. But please, if it makes you feel better, go for it.

quote:

---

I posted several vids of the bugs/glitches still taking place, post-patch. I swear you guys just ignore shite that runs contrary to your presuppositions.

---

See above. I ignore irrelevant, old information, which is the majority of what you posted.

Kudos.