- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU: weak in the QB stable
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:41 am to RummelTiger
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:41 am to RummelTiger
quote:
How the frick is saying current players are a 'liability to the program
Rummel,
the not having a better vetted stable is the unacceptable liability.
This post was edited on 1/31/12 at 11:41 am
2
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:45 am to tiger88
what i got out of this thread....
you're not as smart as you think you are. perhaps you should just request a ban and start over with a new name because your last two threads have made you look stupid as shite.
quote:decided to start another thread in a subtle attempt to bash the LSU coaching staff and got his arse completely handed to him.
tiger88
you're not as smart as you think you are. perhaps you should just request a ban and start over with a new name because your last two threads have made you look stupid as shite.
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:49 am to tiger88
quote:
the not having a better vetted stable is the unacceptable liability.
So, if they were all 5*, then you'd be cool with that?
Because, I mean, we do have 3 4* (Randall, Liggins, and Rivers) depending on what recruiting service you look at...
Yeah, 4* backing up a 5*...shitty vetting indeed.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News