- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/2/12 at 8:27 pm to Buttabean7406
quote:
I could have sworn although and EE is already in school they still did have to sign a LOI on signing day
They don't sign a LOI. It's completely and utterly unnecessary. I can imagine something being staged to give a sense of being part of the excitement, but they don't sign a LOI.
Posted on 1/2/12 at 8:32 pm to Buttabean7406
Here is another clarification from the same article.
So if the EE comes in and LSU has been under the 85 limit during (say 84) the current year then one of the EE is exempt from the 25 rule but all other EEs would be required to count toward the 25 limit. Not sure if that means they are required to sign a LOI. Don't really see the point given the EEs are already on scholarship and enrolled in classes.
quote:
Reduced the permissible number of signees from 28 to 25 and moves back the start date for the window for counting date back to Dec. 1. Allow signees to be exempt from the 25 limit if they can be counted as an initial counter in the current year.
So if the EE comes in and LSU has been under the 85 limit during (say 84) the current year then one of the EE is exempt from the 25 rule but all other EEs would be required to count toward the 25 limit. Not sure if that means they are required to sign a LOI. Don't really see the point given the EEs are already on scholarship and enrolled in classes.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News