- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Big 12 5-1 so far in bowls with 2 more to play.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:52 pm
Beast mode.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:54 pm to 7thWardTiger
Alabama > Oklahoma State
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:55 pm to 7thWardTiger
I consider mzzou and aandm SEC now
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:56 pm to 7thWardTiger
5-1, but none of those games are major bowls.
It's easy to beat up on the dregs of the college football world.
It's easy to beat up on the dregs of the college football world.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:56 pm to 7thWardTiger
3-1*
texas a*m
mizz
=
sec
texas a*m
mizz
=
sec
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:59 pm to tigerNation09
its pretty pathetic that the big 12 has already played most of their bowls already
This post was edited on 12/31/11 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:59 pm to tigerNation09
Neither aTm nor Mizzou have competed in their first SEC game, therefore 5-1, no asterisk.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 3:59 pm to tigerNation09
quote:
3-1*
texas a*m
mizz
=
sec
ok 4-1 add TCU and add another W after WVU wins
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:01 pm to bigt41
quote:
its pretty pathetic that the big 12 has already played most of their bowls already
Why? Haven't these always been their bowl tie ins?
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:03 pm to bigt41
quote:
its pretty pathetic that the big 12 has already played most of their bowls already
Its pathetic most of their bowl tie ins are before New Years?
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:04 pm to 7thWardTiger
Top to bottom it was the best conference, no one disputes this.
Sec had the best Top 2.
PAC 12 had the best Top 3.
Big 12 had the best Top 4 and on.
Sec had the best Top 2.
PAC 12 had the best Top 3.
Big 12 had the best Top 4 and on.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:07 pm to 7thWardTiger
Good year for them. Next year's Big 12 bowls will be interesting by comparison. Both Mizzou and TAMU won their bowls. Will their replacements do the same next year?
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:10 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
Big 12 had the best Top 4
No they didn't. LSU, Bama, Arky, Georgia > Ok. St, Oklahoma, Kansas St. and Baylor. If you want to say top 6 then I would still take the SEC over BIG 12.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:11 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
Top to bottom it was the best conference, no one disputes this.
Way overrated.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:22 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
PAC 12 had the best Top 3.
LSU, Bama, Arkansas >>>> Oregon, Stanford, USC
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:23 pm to 7thWardTiger
quote:
Neither aTm nor Mizzou have competed in their first SEC game, therefore 5-1, no asterisk.
True. They may not have been bowl eligible had they played in the SEC this year.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:26 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
LSU, Bama, Arkansas >>>> Oregon, Stanford, USC
And Stanford is about to get exposed on Monday
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:28 pm to 7thWardTiger
Wait until Tyler Wilson abuses the 105th ranked Pass D from K-State.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:30 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
LSU, Bama, Arkansas >>>> Oregon, Stanford, USC
Easily. Anyone arguing against is a f'king loon.
Posted on 12/31/11 at 4:42 pm to ZTiger87
Just ignore Zamoro when it comes to college football conference discussions. His hatred of all things is SEC is quite amusing.......Though I do acknowledge many SEC fans are iriitating and probably do drive outsiders to hatred.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News