- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dan Gilbert killed the Chris Paul trade
Posted on 12/9/11 at 12:51 am to Buffalo Breh
Posted on 12/9/11 at 12:51 am to Buffalo Breh
quote:
How
It doesn't matter how "attractive" the package is, Paul is only going to sign an extension with a select handful of clubs...it is his leverage. Boston is not on the list. There isn't a team in the league willing to give up anything of value without an extension already agreed upon.
2
Posted on 12/9/11 at 12:53 am to brgfather129
I saw Paul demand a trade to NY not LA, what changed
Posted on 12/9/11 at 1:22 am to brgfather129
quote:
There isn't a team in the league willing to give up anything of value without an extension already agreed upon.
FWIW, thanks to the new CBA no player will ever sign another extension. You can get longer deals by signing new contracts than you can by extending current contracts. So any team that trades for Paul will be taking a gamble that he leaves.
The Lakers are betting that he stays, which is why they were willing to give up Odom and Gasol for him. The Clippers aren't so sure about that bet, which is why they aren't willing to give up Eric Gordon or the Minny #1 pick.
It's a terrible terrible provision in the CBA. I have no idea how it got in there or which side supports it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News