Started By
Message
locked post

Beating Iowa St.

Posted on 12/5/11 at 6:59 am
Posted by Tiger-Striped-Bass
The Bay Area
Member since Dec 2004
1266 posts
Posted on 12/5/11 at 6:59 am
With Bama the clearly better team, how does making that almost-made field goal and beating Iowa State all of a sudden make OK St. better than Bama and deserving to go to the big game? That's what we're saying right? Or, are we saying that Bama deserves to get in even against an undefeated OK St. since they are clearly the better team?

Does OK St pass the eyeball test if they make that field goal?

If it comes down to that field goal, OK St. should never have been in the discussion, ever.
This post was edited on 12/5/11 at 7:03 am
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
21974 posts
Posted on 12/5/11 at 7:00 am to
the only reason bama got in is because osu has "state" behind their name.
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10186 posts
Posted on 12/5/11 at 7:17 am to
Good teams are normally allowed some bad games, provided they pull them out in the end.
Posted by Frankie Knuckles
Member since Jul 2010
2807 posts
Posted on 12/5/11 at 7:24 am to
quote:

how does making that almost-made field goal and beating Iowa State all of a sudden make OK St. better than Bama and deserving to go to the big game? That's what we're saying right?
Loss to an unranked team is the reason, not a single FG play. If they are the real #2 they should have blown Iowa St out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram