- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Texas A&M, at 6-6, is ranked #12 in Sagarin ELO-CHESS
Posted on 11/27/11 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 11/27/11 at 2:44 pm
Ahead of 10-2 Wisconsin. The computers absolutely love the Big-12-2.
LSU only has 3 games against the Top 30. Oklahoma has played 8 games against the Top 30 so far. OSU has 7 games. Jeez.
LSU only has 3 games against the Top 30. Oklahoma has played 8 games against the Top 30 so far. OSU has 7 games. Jeez.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 2:49 pm to slackster
So...for Okie State, you're saying there's a chance?
Apparently, deserve has got nothing to do with the BCS title according to the voters...because Okie State's FBS opponents TROUNCE Bama's "4" FBS winning record opponents.

Apparently, deserve has got nothing to do with the BCS title according to the voters...because Okie State's FBS opponents TROUNCE Bama's "4" FBS winning record opponents.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 4:09 pm to tylercsbn9
basically they just played 5 good/elite teams and the 5 losses don't hurt them as badly
Posted on 11/27/11 at 4:09 pm to slackster
Do you realize how weak Wiscy strength if schedule is? Also, aTm is 17th in Sagarins ELO-Chess, not 12. Wiscy is 26th.
Posted on 11/27/11 at 5:12 pm to slackster
which is ridiculous
sagarin can be useful for handicapping games but it just isn't capable of applying common sense - that's just the nature of a computer tho it is limited by whatever games were played that year and vulnerable to a few results skewing what you think of the whole lot of it
sagarin can be useful for handicapping games but it just isn't capable of applying common sense - that's just the nature of a computer tho it is limited by whatever games were played that year and vulnerable to a few results skewing what you think of the whole lot of it
Posted on 11/27/11 at 5:15 pm to molsusports
well TAMU is a victim of a really tough schedule
let's say that we're ranking teams objectively (1 is better than 2, who is better than 3, etc)
if TAMU lost to better teams, then why should they be punished? TAMU is a funny little outlier that makes the conversation interesting
there isn't a lot of shame in losing to OU, OSU, Texas, KSU, and Arky this year (they do have 1 bad loss elsewhere)
let's say that we're ranking teams objectively (1 is better than 2, who is better than 3, etc)
if TAMU lost to better teams, then why should they be punished? TAMU is a funny little outlier that makes the conversation interesting
there isn't a lot of shame in losing to OU, OSU, Texas, KSU, and Arky this year (they do have 1 bad loss elsewhere)
Posted on 11/27/11 at 5:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
OU, OSU, Texas, KSU, and Arky this year (they do have 1 bad loss elsewhere)
was it Mizzou? Not a horrible loss there, either, based on schedules
Popular
Back to top
