- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Three eligible receivers near JJ's "intentional grounding"
Posted on 11/14/11 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/14/11 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
while it was a good call, I don't know if it was a good call for JJ.
Which means it wasn't a good call. Everyone in the stadium knows that Jefferson's primary weakness is holding on to the ball and taking sacks, and you put him in a position to do just that. True to form, he did. Now if they had run that play on first down it may have been a good call. But on 3rd and 8 the defense isn't going to bite on the play action; they're playing pass. Poor call, poorly executed.
But so what? It seems like every game the rant picks out Jefferson's worst play and spends the next four days breaking it down and assigning blame. I realize there's not much else to talk about after the WKU game, but jeez.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 10:12 am to Cold Cous Cous
quote:
quote:
while it was a good call, I don't know if it was a good call for JJ.
Which means it wasn't a good call. Everyone in the stadium knows that Jefferson's primary weakness is holding on to the ball and taking sacks, and you put him in a position to do just that.
Eh they called the exact same play in the redzone against florida and JJ threw it away into the stands because Reuban was covered. Hes been able to do it before. The ball should have been out earlier.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)