Started By
Message

re: Three eligible receivers near JJ's "intentional grounding"

Posted on 11/14/11 at 10:09 am to
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15056 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 10:09 am to
quote:

while it was a good call, I don't know if it was a good call for JJ.


Which means it wasn't a good call. Everyone in the stadium knows that Jefferson's primary weakness is holding on to the ball and taking sacks, and you put him in a position to do just that. True to form, he did. Now if they had run that play on first down it may have been a good call. But on 3rd and 8 the defense isn't going to bite on the play action; they're playing pass. Poor call, poorly executed.

But so what? It seems like every game the rant picks out Jefferson's worst play and spends the next four days breaking it down and assigning blame. I realize there's not much else to talk about after the WKU game, but jeez.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32272 posts
Posted on 11/14/11 at 10:12 am to
quote:

quote:
while it was a good call, I don't know if it was a good call for JJ.


Which means it wasn't a good call. Everyone in the stadium knows that Jefferson's primary weakness is holding on to the ball and taking sacks, and you put him in a position to do just that.


Eh they called the exact same play in the redzone against florida and JJ threw it away into the stands because Reuban was covered. Hes been able to do it before. The ball should have been out earlier.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram