- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How many think we are 10-0 if Jefferson starts each game this season
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:14 am
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:14 am
I say no.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:18 am to Slim
Considering that in all but 2 games we only had to score 12 points to win, I say yes.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:19 am to Slim
I say yes we would be, because in the grand scheme, our QB's (save the Bama game-cuz without JJ we lose that game) have not been the deciding factor in us winning. We have won games by wearing our opponents out, both on defense and offense. Teams hang with us for a half, then they submit..QB's just have to throw just enough to keep the defenses honest.
Without JJ we are 9-1.
Without JJ we are 9-1.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:21 am to Slim
I say if your mom had a dick she'd be your daddy. Stop being a divisive prick.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:25 am to Slim
I say no. JL had three interceptions all year. JJ would have had more and taken more sacks.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:26 am to iluvlsusports
JJ threw 7 TD's all season in 2010 and that includes the bowl game.
I have a hard time seeing LSU 10-0 with JJ at QB all season.
I have a hard time seeing LSU 10-0 with JJ at QB all season.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:28 am to iluvlsusports
Your signature says it all..just replace the ducks with LSU didn't just beat all teams, they beat them all up..LOL
That's why I think the QB's had little to do with most of the wins.
That's why I think the QB's had little to do with most of the wins.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:29 am to iluvlsusports
To the OP,
Name me the games we would have LOST with JJ starting and why?
I dont recall one game where Lee was literally lighting it up like Dan Marino and Aaron Rodgers. Not once did he throw a 300yd 3 td game. Why? Because he never needed to. Lee only MANAGED the games. He didnt go out and win games. The running game and a championship defense won us those games. Not Lee. Lee nearly cost us the Bama game though.
Name me the games we would have LOST with JJ starting and why?
I dont recall one game where Lee was literally lighting it up like Dan Marino and Aaron Rodgers. Not once did he throw a 300yd 3 td game. Why? Because he never needed to. Lee only MANAGED the games. He didnt go out and win games. The running game and a championship defense won us those games. Not Lee. Lee nearly cost us the Bama game though.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:32 am to Weizenman
That's my favorite quote, I'll change it to "everybody" if we go undefeated.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:33 am to amarti9
quote:
I dont recall one game where Lee was literally lighting it up like Dan Marino and Aaron Rodgers. Not once did he throw a 300yd 3 td game. Why? Because he never needed to. Lee only MANAGED the games.
You are 100 percent correct my man
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:38 am to Slim
Who knows, and it's pretty irrelevent. All indications point to yes, however. Lee will finish with half as many passing yards and a comparable number of TDs as JJ did his sophomore year. We are not a QB dependent team. Neither QB has won us a single game this year. Lee likely would have lost us Alabama, but who knows.
This post was edited on 11/13/11 at 6:52 am
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:45 am to Navytiger74
The difference is the crispness of the throws coming from the two. JJ's pass to Shep in the Bama game should have been an easy TD but he threw it to the wrong side and we never did score a TD on that drive. Lst night the long throw to Clement was behind him or that would have been a walk-in TD for the coonass. (Imagine that celebration )
You look at how much JJ screwed up a year ago yet Les never gave Lee his deserved and earned opportunity to play more. This year we see Lee making far fewer mistakes than JJ did last year and Les seems ready to pull the rug out on Jarrett.
For all the good Les has done he's fudged up this QB tandem from the start. I can't wait till next year when we have one undisputed QB in Mett that is the whole package.
You look at how much JJ screwed up a year ago yet Les never gave Lee his deserved and earned opportunity to play more. This year we see Lee making far fewer mistakes than JJ did last year and Les seems ready to pull the rug out on Jarrett.
For all the good Les has done he's fudged up this QB tandem from the start. I can't wait till next year when we have one undisputed QB in Mett that is the whole package.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:53 am to Bayou
And what if the QB situation is dictated by Stud & Krags? Maybe we should say that ALL the coaches are punishing poor widdle JL and hurting his confidence.
Nobody knows the answer to how many wins or losses we would have with JJ starting. NOBODY.
Nobody knows the answer to how many wins or losses we would have with JJ starting. NOBODY.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:55 am to ChenierauTigre
Maybe not but one thing is for sure-we'd be 9 and 1 had JJ not played against Bama
Posted on 11/13/11 at 6:59 am to StarkvilleTigerFan
I say who gives a frick!! We're 10-0 and it doesn't matter how we got here!
Posted on 11/13/11 at 7:44 am to Slim
No. We are 9-1, and we win a few nail biters.
Posted on 11/13/11 at 7:47 am to Dupont3
The defense would have been gassed In games after having the offense go 3 and out a ton.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News