- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Here Are The Choices: Missouri or West Virginia
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:52 pm
Those are the choices. So which one would you take?
I really don't care for either but if I am forced into choosing between Denny's and Waffle House I guess I would go for West Virginia only because:
1) We can put them in the east division and no schools would have to be moved.
2) Their basketball team is better.
3) They could offer a decent rivalry with neighboring Kentucky...the Coal Mine Classic or some crap like that. Kentucky does sit up there by itself.
Best reasons I could find.
I really don't care for either but if I am forced into choosing between Denny's and Waffle House I guess I would go for West Virginia only because:
1) We can put them in the east division and no schools would have to be moved.
2) Their basketball team is better.
3) They could offer a decent rivalry with neighboring Kentucky...the Coal Mine Classic or some crap like that. Kentucky does sit up there by itself.
Best reasons I could find.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:55 pm to GABlueDog
quote:
2) Their basketball team is better.
3) They could offer a decent rivalry with neighboring Kentucky...the Coal Mine Classic or some crap like that. Kentucky does sit up there by itself.
You could say the same thing about Mizzou, really.
Except take out Kentucky.. and add in Arkansas for an Arky-Mizzou rivalry.
Not saying that's what I would like to see, just pointing it out.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:57 pm to paperstreet
Mizzou>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WVU
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:58 pm to paperstreet
give me Mizzou over WV but Va Tech over both.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:59 pm to paperstreet
Yea, I agree the latter two are flimsy. The primary motivation is this would be the most convenient choice with the addition of 1 team in the west and 1 team in the east and leaving all member schools in their respective divisions. That plus I see no difference in the quality of football played by Missouri and West Virginia. However, WV and Kentucky basketball would be a worthwhile addition to the SEC.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:00 pm to Elleshoe
Another team for east so West Va or Va Tech to balance it out
Mizzou and A&M to west would mean LSU is now part of the Big 12 West along with Ark which sucks
Mizzou and A&M to west would mean LSU is now part of the Big 12 West along with Ark which sucks
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:02 pm to GABlueDog
West Virginia without question.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:03 pm to stapuffmarshy
OK, you have to explain to me how Missouri is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WV because I can't see it.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:03 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
give me Mizzou over WV but Va Tech over both.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:05 pm to GABlueDog
West Virginia
Reason 1 is the most important. I don't want the divisions split up.
Plus I think 'eers would actually embrace the move and the competition.
Reason 1 is the most important. I don't want the divisions split up.
Plus I think 'eers would actually embrace the move and the competition.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:11 pm to GABlueDog
quote:Athletically they are about equal, but Mizzou has a much better reputation for academics.
OK, you have to explain to me how Missouri is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WV because I can't see it
Also, there are shitload more TV sets ($) in Missouri.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:14 pm to johnnydrama
<--------
when I think of Missouri I think of Chase Daniel
plus they don't give a frick about CFB
when I think of Missouri I think of Chase Daniel
plus they don't give a frick about CFB
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:17 pm to GABlueDog
Both are terrible options that aren't a great fit IMO.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:25 pm to johnnydrama
Missouri's stadium sucks.
They offer a marginally successful football team and nothing more. At least WV has good basketball.
Kansas City and St. Louis are pro sports towns, not college sports towns. They are like mini-Chicagos.
Missouri's academics are superior to those of West Virginia, I agree with this.
Both schools lack funding in their athletic budgets.
Missouri and Arkansas could start up a rivalry (the Meth Lab Classic) but West Virginia could also fit nicely with Kentucky (both are poor, have hollers, and coal).
They offer a marginally successful football team and nothing more. At least WV has good basketball.
Kansas City and St. Louis are pro sports towns, not college sports towns. They are like mini-Chicagos.
Missouri's academics are superior to those of West Virginia, I agree with this.
Both schools lack funding in their athletic budgets.
Missouri and Arkansas could start up a rivalry (the Meth Lab Classic) but West Virginia could also fit nicely with Kentucky (both are poor, have hollers, and coal).
Posted on 9/7/11 at 2:34 pm to bbap
WVU. I actually mentioned them about a month ago, and got jumped for it. I hope they get the invite.
Popular
Back to top

12





