- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Could we see major realignment within the conference?
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:21 am
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:21 am
Moving to 13 and eventually 14 teams raises major problems with how the SEC schedule works.
#1- We won't move to 9 conference games. The revenue being made by the schools for the rent a win home games and the season opening neutral site games is too much to give up. Athletic Departments already write in these revenues when filling out their budget each year. They simply won't want to give up a home game every other year.
#2- If we stay at 8 home games, that raises a competitive balance issue. We all know there is no way games like Auburn-UGA and Alabama-Tennessee get dropped, but of you keep a permanent opponent from the other division and drop to 1 rotating game, you open the door for issues where one team with a significantly easier pair of games from one division has an advantage going into the year. Right now with 3 such games from the other division you pretty much always ensure you have one traditionally strong opponent, one traditionally weak opponent and your permanent rival. This would not longer be the case.
So what's the solution? I'm not sure, but one way would be to either reshuffle the divisions so that a permanent cross division opponent is no longer necessary (divisions would no longer be geographically based) OR get rid of the divisions and give each team 4 permanent opponents and rotate the other 4 from the remaining 9 teams.
#1- We won't move to 9 conference games. The revenue being made by the schools for the rent a win home games and the season opening neutral site games is too much to give up. Athletic Departments already write in these revenues when filling out their budget each year. They simply won't want to give up a home game every other year.
#2- If we stay at 8 home games, that raises a competitive balance issue. We all know there is no way games like Auburn-UGA and Alabama-Tennessee get dropped, but of you keep a permanent opponent from the other division and drop to 1 rotating game, you open the door for issues where one team with a significantly easier pair of games from one division has an advantage going into the year. Right now with 3 such games from the other division you pretty much always ensure you have one traditionally strong opponent, one traditionally weak opponent and your permanent rival. This would not longer be the case.
So what's the solution? I'm not sure, but one way would be to either reshuffle the divisions so that a permanent cross division opponent is no longer necessary (divisions would no longer be geographically based) OR get rid of the divisions and give each team 4 permanent opponents and rotate the other 4 from the remaining 9 teams.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:22 am to Draconian Sanctions
What ever we do it should begin with getting rid of The Flagship.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:22 am to Draconian Sanctions
conference board. GTFO
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:23 am to Draconian Sanctions
Nine conference games is my prediction.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:24 am to bona fide
quote:
Nine conference games is my prediction.
This thread is missing some Girls' Generation gifs.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:24 am to Draconian Sanctions
Clay Travis had a article on this yesterday. He got a math analyst to look at the schedule and said next year would be impossible scheduling wise.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:24 am to Draconian Sanctions
Bama and Aubie to the east,that will make our biggest rivals that much more heated...
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:29 am to TT9
Hahaha, and just leave LSU with a walk-in to Atlanta every year?
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:31 am to Swoopin
quote:
Hahaha, and just leave Arkansas with a mercyknee-in to Atlanta every year?
FIFY
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:35 am to Swoopin
They would have arky,a@m,and perhaps Oklahoma to deal with...
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:36 am to WaveHog
"What ever we do it should begin with getting rid of The Flagship."
Inbred & not talking about Arky.
Inbred & not talking about Arky.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:37 am to TT9
If anyone's attached to Texas, it's OU.
I'm just going to assume you're joking because having Florida, UGA, UT, Auburn and Alabama in one division is batshit retarded.
I'm just going to assume you're joking because having Florida, UGA, UT, Auburn and Alabama in one division is batshit retarded.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:38 am to Swoopin
That's what some of the analysts have said,not I..I would think its implausible as well...
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:48 am to TT9
Bama (Permanent Auburn)
LSU (Permanent Florida)
UT (permanent UGA)
Arkie (Permanent USCe)
TAM (Permanent V. Tech)
MSU (Permanent Ole Miss)
Vandy (Permanent UK)
--------------
Florida
Auburn
UGA
USCe
Virginia Tech
ole Miss
UK
It does NOT have to be east and west... In fact, I can see them dividing schools within the same state.
LSU (Permanent Florida)
UT (permanent UGA)
Arkie (Permanent USCe)
TAM (Permanent V. Tech)
MSU (Permanent Ole Miss)
Vandy (Permanent UK)
--------------
Florida
Auburn
UGA
USCe
Virginia Tech
ole Miss
UK
It does NOT have to be east and west... In fact, I can see them dividing schools within the same state.
This post was edited on 9/1/11 at 9:51 am
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:52 am to TT9
16 teams, 4 divisions of 4, winner of those divisions play for a spot in Atlanta. Teams can still play a 7 team conference schedule with plenty of room left to play other teams not in their division, or some OOC games.
In reality we could have 16 teams and only add 2 extra "playoff" type games. I think any SEC team that makes it through that gauntlet would have a pretty strong shot at a NCG appearance, even with a loss.
In reality we could have 16 teams and only add 2 extra "playoff" type games. I think any SEC team that makes it through that gauntlet would have a pretty strong shot at a NCG appearance, even with a loss.
This post was edited on 9/1/11 at 9:53 am
Posted on 9/1/11 at 9:59 am to allin2010
quote:
Bama (Permanent Auburn)
LSU (Permanent Florida)
UT (permanent UGA)
Arkie (Permanent USCe)
TAM (Permanent V. Tech)
MSU (Permanent Ole Miss)
Vandy (Permanent UK)
--------------
Florida
Auburn
UGA
USCe
Virginia Tech
ole Miss
UK
It does NOT have to be east and west... In fact, I can see them dividing schools within the same state.
I could probably live with that.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 10:00 am to The ChizMan Cometh
That is the ticket Chiz. 5perm/2-3rotate/4-5 out of conference and a 4 team play off for the 2 spots in the championship. otherwise the posibility exist that the SEC champ could have 2or 3 losses every year. Also, TV $ would increase with the play off and the OoC schools need to play the teams in the SEC to make that $.
Posted on 9/1/11 at 10:00 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
We all know there is no way games like Auburn-UGA and Alabama-Tennessee get dropped
I want to believe that, but I'm not nearly that confident.
Popular
Back to top


8







