Started By
Message
locked post

It still makes no sense for the Big "12" to disband

Posted on 8/14/11 at 11:53 am
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 11:53 am
Disbanding means a lot of schools lose access to a BCS auto-bid, and there are plenty of viable replacements out there whose on-field performances guarantee that the conference will not lose its auto-bid (can't find the link, but the requirements for keeping an auto-bid are REALLY easy to meet; no conference has ever come close to losing its bid).

Houston
TCU
BYU
Air Force
Nevada
UNLV
Boise State
UTEP
Posted by bigjuice56
Ponchatoula, LA
Member since Mar 2009
1136 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 11:58 am to
It could work. As long as no else leaves, adding TCU, Houston, and BYU to get to 12. Have all the Texas teams and BYU in the South, move OK and OK St. to the North with the rest of their Big 8 rivals. Go to the current SEC scheduling format for the sole purpose of keeping the OK-UT game an annual affair.
Posted by Dice
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
896 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 11:59 am to
I think the issue in the future would be if they would even be considered an elite conference - if Big 10, Pac 12 and SEC all expand to 16 teams. Big 12 be UT, OU and who else?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

It could work. As long as no else leaves, adding TCU, Houston, and BYU to get to 12. Have all the Texas teams and BYU in the South, move OK and OK St. to the North with the rest of their Big 8 rivals. Go to the current SEC scheduling format for the sole purpose of keeping the OK-UT game an annual affair.

+1

The worst thing the Big 12 can do is panic.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
11023 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:02 pm to
I hope the big 12 stays together. I think they should expand and add Houston and see if BYU or TCU wants to join. I think they could also see about SMU.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

I think the issue in the future would be if they would even be considered an elite conference - if Big 10, Pac 12 and SEC all expand to 16 teams. Big 12 be UT, OU and who else?
Wouldn't matter. The requirements for keeping an auto-bid are incredibly easy to meet.

Also, the number of BCS bowls will not decrease, making it highly unlikely for any of the six AQ conferences to lose their auto-bids.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24080 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:08 pm to
I agree, its highly unlikely they will disband. It is all up to Texas, and Texas likes having an easy schedule, plus conference TV money on top of the LHN money. The names I'm hearing from people no more connected than me are BYU and UH.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:10 pm to
But if Texas and OKlahoma/OSU leave and the conference is filled with BYU, Houston, Air Force and similar schools, should it be an AQ conference still?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

But if Texas and OKlahoma/OSU leave and the conference is filled with BYU, Houston, Air Force and similar schools, should it be an AQ conference still?
Absolutely. It will still meet the requirements and probably be better than the ACC (the Big East will get a little better).

Through last year, the Big 12 was generally the 2nd best conference. Without Nebraska, Colorado, and A&M, each of whom has sucked for at least half the past decade, the conference doesn't drop any more than two spots. The Big 9 is #4 at the worst.

If Texas and the Oklahomas leave (OSU isn't going anywhere, though), the right additions will keep it just fine. This conference isn't in danger if it doesn't panic. Trust me.
Posted by BayouBengal
Member since Nov 2003
28288 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

I agree, its highly unlikely they will disband. It is all up to Texas, and Texas likes having an easy schedule, plus conference TV money on top of the LHN money. The names I'm hearing from people no more connected than me are BYU and UH.


So it'd MWC with an upgrade.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

It still makes no sense for the Big "12" to disband


Agree. Even if A&M does leave, it still makes sense for UT and Oklahoma to hold things together considering their easier path to the BCS and lopsided revenue sharing. I'm sure TCU would be glad to drop their move to the Big East to join the Big 12 which would retain 10 teams and no need for a conference championship. Texas and Oklahoma basically have one big game each season against each other and they are in the Fiesta Bowl with a chance at a BCS Championship spot. They basically can have their cake and eat it too if they simply keep the ingredients together.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Agree. Even if A&M does leave, it still makes sense for UT and Oklahoma to hold things together considering their easier path to the BCS and lopsided revenue sharing. I'm sure TCU would be glad to drop their move to the Big East to join the Big 12 which would retain 10 teams and no need for a conference championship. Texas and Oklahoma basically have one big game each season against each other and they are in the Fiesta Bowl with a chance at a BCS Championship spot. They basically can have their cake and eat it too if they simply keep the ingredients together.

It's a pretty sweet deal when you think about it. Run off three contenders and keep the goodies to yourself...
Posted by Dice
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
896 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

If Texas and the Oklahomas leave (OSU isn't going anywhere, though), the right additions will keep it just fine. This conference isn't in danger if it doesn't panic. Trust me.


Not if 3 - 4 other conferences go to 16 top notch teams - this will be the end of the BCS thus end of the Big 12. The Big 12 isn't much right now - much less if Pac 12 Big 10 and SEC all go to 16 teams.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24080 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:44 pm to
What is really scaring Texas right now is the possibility of A&M going to the SEC being the spark for superconferences. Anyone not in a conference then will be SOL, and no superconference is going to allow the longhorns to keep their network. They would be forced to beg, hat in hand, for someone to take them with the albatross of the LHN around their neck.
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26183 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

It will still meet the requirements and probably be better than the ACC (the Big East will get a little better).


What a joke
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

What is really scaring Texas right now is the possibility of A&M going to the SEC being the spark for superconferences. Anyone not in a conference then will be SOL, and no superconference is going to allow the longhorns to keep their network. They would be forced to beg, hat in hand, for someone to take them with the albatross of the LHN around their neck.
I know you really want it to be like this, and I can sympathize, but Texas will be just fine; they won't be left out of anything, ever.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

quote:
It will still meet the requirements and probably be better than the ACC (the Big East will get a little better).



What a joke
What part? I'm guessing you're taking up for the ACC? In the BCS era, the Big East has been better than the ACC top-to-bottom. All the BCS computers confirm this. Last year was the Big East's worst year; they will get better, no doubt.

The ACC is obviously about to get a little worse.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44172 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 2:08 pm to
I agree with him, the ACC would be a lot better than the 'new Big 12'. If you compared them, VA Tech, Fla State, & Miami would be head and shoulders above any team in the Big12. Then you could make a for BC, Ga Tech, Maryland, & Clemson.



Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58934 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 2:15 pm to
They won't disband. There are plenty of other schools that would jump at the opportunity to join the big 12. They will just add UH to replace A&M and stay at 10 teams for now.

BTW how much does this suck for TCU right now? They would be a fine replacement for A&M but they are in with the big east for now. Anyone know if they could break away from the big east to join the Big 12?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466470 posts
Posted on 8/14/11 at 2:31 pm to
i agree

get UH for sure

getting one of the schools closer to cali (Nevada, UNLV) would probably help (new markets, hurt the pac12 market share, etc)

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram