- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Say NO to Missouri and Clemson
Posted on 8/13/11 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 8/13/11 at 8:47 pm
4 Tigers?
Posted on 8/13/11 at 8:59 pm to tigerskin
Will do, pal. Just as soon as Slive calls and asks me how I vote.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:02 pm to tigerskin
i forgot about mascots and nicknames being the basis of conference expansion
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:07 pm to tigerskin
Honestly, that would be terrible.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:08 pm to RhodeIslandRed
Pretty sure Slive reads the board. I can't remember his username though.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:08 pm to tigerskin
I don't think Mizzou wants any part of the SEC. Hell seen what happen when they faced Oklahoma 2 times in one year. Now try facing 5 teams with OU's talent in one year. Mizzou don't have the athletes to compete in the SEC.
This post was edited on 8/13/11 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:13 pm to bayou2003
quote:
I don't think Mizzou wants any part of the SEC. Hell seen what happen when they faced Oklahoma 2 times in one year. Now try facing 5 teams with OU's talent in one year. Mizzou don't have the athletes to compete in the SEC.
I disagree at least from what I've been reading on one of their boards.
ETA: They realize that what you say about their athletes is true, but they also know that the BIG XII is a dead man walking and that it does not get any better than the SEC.
This post was edited on 8/13/11 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:17 pm to RhodeIslandRed
quote:
I disagree at least from what I've been reading on one of their boards.
Haven't been to any boards for Mizzou. Even though I'm in Missouri. I'm in Joplin which is not Mizzou country, more fans for OU, Arkansas and Missouri State down here. I read in the STL paper about Mizzou and the SEC. I'd love for Mizzou to join the SEC, that way I can drive to Columbia to see LSU play up there.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:23 pm to tigerskin
There would definitely have to be a name change stipulation if they came in. Maybe the Clemson War Eagles and the Missouri Plainsmen 
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:32 pm to HooDooWitch
LSU Bayou Bengals
Missouri Mizzoucats
Auburn War Teagles
Clemson RockHillcats
Missouri Mizzoucats
Auburn War Teagles
Clemson RockHillcats
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:33 pm to bayou2003
quote:
I'm in Joplin
You're just a little closer to Columbia than me. But like you I am closer to it, Nashville and Oxford than Baton Rouge. Would love to tailgate in Columbia and show the Bratwurst and bean dip crowd what it's all about.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 9:37 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Say NO to Missouri and Clemson
Yes, to Missouri and the St. Louis and Kansas City TV markets. No, to Clemson which brings nothing to the table.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 10:05 pm to tigerskin
That's what I've been screaming. F that in the arse.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 10:09 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Too many tigers. That would suck.
Auburn v. Clemson Gameday Predictions. Tigers by a field goal.
Yeah, that's not gonna work.
Clemson is probably a no-go anyway.
Auburn v. Clemson Gameday Predictions. Tigers by a field goal.
Yeah, that's not gonna work.
Clemson is probably a no-go anyway.
Posted on 8/13/11 at 10:22 pm to tigerskin
I don't get the Missouri angle. yes they have decent size media markets with st louis and KC. but Missouri is meh. bring in the aggies and the noles
Posted on 8/13/11 at 10:49 pm to RhodeIslandRed
quote:
I disagree at least from what I've been reading on one of their boards.
True, because they realize that as soon as AtM goes, the Big 12-2-1 has as much long-term stability as a Joplin double-wide. They'll take the first offer that comes along, and the SEC is much more likely than the Big-10.
They're already pissed at the Big-12-2-1 over the bowl selection process and Texas' $. Their noise about leaving for the Big-10 is what got Nebraska moving and started this whole mess.
This post was edited on 8/13/11 at 10:54 pm
Popular
Back to top
8







