Started By
Message

re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2: Film Review

Posted on 7/7/11 at 8:20 am to
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28907 posts
Posted on 7/7/11 at 8:20 am to
I have no interest in reading the books, so the movies are ok to me.

When I first sat down and watched a HP movie last year, I was actually surprised how good it was after hearing how crap they are compared to the books.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 7/7/11 at 8:32 am to
Actually, my biggest gripe with the movies have always been that they are too respectful of the source material, particulaerly the first two films. It felt like it was just rushing to get to specific plot points. I do think they conciously failed to develop some characters, focusing primarily on Harry. This means some second tier characters have been abslutely gutted in the film, and come their "big moment", we don't really care that much about them - Tonks, the Weasley twins, even Neville to some extent.

I do think the films LOOK very good, and the films are much better at the action sequences, which Rowling sort of sucks at writing about. So I liked adding the attack on the burrows. It something the films do well that the books don't.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram