- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Cavs trade JJ Hickson to the Kings
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:51 pm to Fun Bunch
The same JJ Hickson who was so untouchable that they wouldn't part ways with him to get Amar'e Stoudemire?
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:51 pm to Fun Bunch
Should be fun to watch Hickson, Cousins, Evans, Thornton, and Jimmer fight for shots. I like it from the Cavs end, Casspi looked really promising his rookie year, and should benefit going from Evans to Kyrie as his PG.
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:51 pm to Fun Bunch

Nice. A few years ago he couldn't be moved for Amare
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:51 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
The same JJ Hickson who was so untouchable that they wouldn't part ways with him to get Amar'e Stoudemire?
My thoughts exactly.
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:52 pm to BayouBengals03
The fluctuation in his trade value obviously displays the mental stability of Dan Gilbert.
Posted on 6/30/11 at 1:56 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The same JJ Hickson who was so untouchable that they wouldn't part ways with him to get Amar'e Stoudemire?
This isnt the whole story. There was no point in signing an aging AS if James wouldnt resign. He would have brough max. JJ at his price was a much better bet long term, James was gone anyways.
Im going to miss JJ, I thought he really stepped up his play this year. A good pick-up for the Kings.
Posted on 6/30/11 at 2:00 pm to Fun Bunch
Nice. Trade a younger player for a guy that averaged less points, rebounds, assists, and blocks while shooting for a lower FG%
Posted on 6/30/11 at 2:02 pm to bomber77
quote:
This isnt the whole story. There was no point in signing an aging AS if James wouldnt resign. He would have brough max. JJ at his price was a much better bet long term, James was gone anyways.
James wasn't going to leave if they won it all. With Amar'e and James, it's pretty hard to imagine that they wouldn't have at least won the Eastern Conference. And I'm pretty sure they would have had home-court over Los Angeles in the Finals, correct?
The point is, they should have been doing anything possible to get LeBron to stay. Getting Stoudemire would have increased their chances of keeping him, simply because it would have made their team better that season.
quote:
Im going to miss JJ, I thought he really stepped up his play this year. A good pick-up for the Kings.
I like this trade for the current Cavs team though. And the Kings got a good young player as well.
Posted on 6/30/11 at 2:20 pm to Fun Bunch
Good move for the Cavs. They just need to hope that one of their picks this year is actually worth it.
Posted on 6/30/11 at 2:30 pm to Fun Bunch
this makes no sense
are the kings accumulating every young 4/5 in the league not named griffin?
are the kings accumulating every young 4/5 in the league not named griffin?
Posted on 6/30/11 at 2:32 pm to bomber77
quote:
There was no point in signing an aging AS if James wouldnt resign.
it would be trading for an aging amare, and he was expiring just like james. if james left, amare leaves, and you're not left with paying jamison for a few more years and you're under the cap
Posted on 6/30/11 at 2:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
are the kings accumulating every young 4/5 in the league not named griffin?
Exactly what I was thinking. I wonder if Jason Thompson is going to be moved now.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 4:20 am to bomber77
quote:
There was no point in signing an aging AS if James wouldnt resign
A championship? Giving your team a much needed upgrade that would help your championship cause is considered "no point"?
Also, Amare's deal was up at the end of the year, just like James. So there was nothing to lose, other than Hickson.
Just unreal that 1 year later they move him after refusing to move him for Amare. Yikes.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 4:34 am to shel311
James couldn't even win w/ Wade/Bosh, he wouldn't have won w/ Amare, either
James is just not a winner in the NBA...
James is just not a winner in the NBA...
Posted on 7/1/11 at 4:53 am to Ghazi
quote:
James is just not a winner in the NBA...
He will be. People could have said the same thing about your boy until this year.
Lebron will put it all together at some point.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:18 am to Fun Bunch
I don't like this trade, mainly because of:
quote:
The Cavaliers said the first-round pick they obtained is lottery protected in 2012 (Nos. 1-14). The pick is then protected in 2013 (1-13), 2014 (1-12) and 2015-2017 (1-10). If the pick is not conveyed by 2017, then Sacramento will convey its own 2017 second-round pick to the Cavaliers.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:24 am to bomber77
quote:
This isnt the whole story. There was no point in signing an aging AS if James wouldnt resign.
If 'Zhilbear' had simply traded for STAT then they James resigns and we don't have a lockout. Really this lockout is a result of the monumental butthurt suffered last July by Dan Gilbert.
Posted on 7/1/11 at 8:33 am to BMW7SERIES
i was waiting for somebody to propose that. i'm glad it was a non-serious post
Popular
Back to top
