- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NBA cba negotations: Owners asked for $45 million hard cap
Posted on 5/16/11 at 4:28 pm to supatigah
Posted on 5/16/11 at 4:28 pm to supatigah
quote:Hornets247 had a nice breakdown of it, from a Hornets perspective.
If the hard cap is phased in then existing contracts remain and new deals are done with the new rules in mind
Talked about teams having two seasons to get their rosters under the hard cap. Also the possibility of each team having the ability to void ONE contract(Similar to the rule after the late 90s lockout). Owners would still have to pay that player his money, his contract just wouldnt count against the cap.
That doesnt seem like a huge sticking point because guys will still get their money.
Imo, this is what could drag this thing on a LONG TIME:
quote:NO WAY the players are gonna go for having contacts slashed that they signed fair and square, because the owners realized they fricked up.
This season, a little over 2 billion dollars was spent on players salaries. The league wants to cut that number significantly. What the league has proposed in the new CBA is an immediate reduction in players salaries; slashing them either 15, 20, or 25 percent, depending on what salary bracket they fit into. From what I have heard, salaries under 6 million would be slashed 15%, 6-11 million would be slashed 20%, and anything over 11 million would be slashed 25%.
Posted on 5/16/11 at 4:31 pm to eyeran
quote:
lso the possibility of each team having the ability to void ONE contract(Similar to the rule after the late 90s lockout). Owners would still have to pay that player his money, his contract just wouldnt count against the cap.
That's another thing that could help get teams under a hard cap a bit quicker.
I guess I was wrong, I always thought you could buy out a guy's contract and then it was off of your books against the cap.
Posted on 5/16/11 at 4:46 pm to eyeran
Link the hornets board thread plz
ETA buying out a Player still counts against your cap number unless his contract is specifically written in a certain way to make it completely voidable
The NBA owners have much more bargaining power than NFL owners because they arent squabbling over splitting profits, they are negotiating to save a third of the league from going under. Even getting salaries cut is better than losing 100 jobs
ETA buying out a Player still counts against your cap number unless his contract is specifically written in a certain way to make it completely voidable
The NBA owners have much more bargaining power than NFL owners because they arent squabbling over splitting profits, they are negotiating to save a third of the league from going under. Even getting salaries cut is better than losing 100 jobs
This post was edited on 5/16/11 at 4:49 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)