- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
USC
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:30 pm
How do they have 24 commitments with their scholarship restrictions?
4
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:32 pm to elleshoo9
early enrollees
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:33 pm to elleshoo9
They are expecting to have their scholi loss reduced to only 15 after the appeal.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:34 pm to SDwhodat
They can expect all they want. We expected Ridley to not play in the cotton bowl.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:35 pm to SDwhodat
quote:
They are expecting to have their scholi loss reduced to only 15 after the appeal.
Not really. They had about 10 EE spots that count towards last year.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:38 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Not really. They had about 10 EE spots that count towards last year.
10? Hard to believe.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:39 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
10? Hard to believe.
Why? Pete carroll's last few classes were small.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:47 pm to RLDSC FAN
Because no way that kind of attrition occurred.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:49 pm to elleshoo9
early enrollees and the schollie reduction does not count this year with the appeal (uless it is heard and ruled on by signing day)
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:53 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
early enrollees and the schollie reduction does not count this year with the appeal (uless it is heard and ruled on by signing day)
I dont want them taking a huge class. I think 25 is sufficient. I doubt the appeal is successful so they cant hurt themselves by having even less than 15 schollies to use next year assuming it stays at a 75 limit.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:56 pm to RLDSC FAN
EE's are allowing them to take advantage.
I read that the NCAA is ruling on the appeal Jan 14 or 24.One of the 2.I know it said January.
I read that the NCAA is ruling on the appeal Jan 14 or 24.One of the 2.I know it said January.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 11:00 pm to lsufanva
The 22nd I believe
Posted on 1/5/11 at 11:22 pm to RLDSC FAN
Thanks i knew i read it was in Jan.NCAA is not going to give in on this one i'm afraid.They have been getting reamed as of late and USC is their pet project for sanctions.If they give in to USC the media will kill them.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 11:32 pm to lsufanva
Oh i agree. Lots of SC fans are getting happy all this stuff is happening and they think that its gonna help. I think its the opposite, the NCAA will use this to show they still have the power.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 12:40 am to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Why? Pete carroll's last few classes were small.
Exactly, the key is USC's last couple of classes weren't full and they are under the 85 limit (didn't realize it was by 10, but i know they have room for some to count back).
Posted on 1/6/11 at 1:53 am to TigerinSoCal
quote:
Exactly, the key is USC's last couple of classes weren't full and they are under the 85 limit (didn't realize it was by 10, but i know they have room for some to count back).
In effect the Unrepentant Serial Cheaters are applying EE's to last year's class and so are spreading the 3 year restrictions over 4. Hopefully the NCAA will take offense to their 15 schollie limit being circumvented and use the appeal to revisit the McKnight issue and USC'S defiant response to the sanctions to increase the penalties. The infractions committee said at the time that there was a strong sentiment among them to make the sanctions even more severe. It has to gall some of them to see the first year of the sanctions essentially disappear.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 4:34 am to BozoBus
There will be no increase in penalties, clown.
USC's response to sanctions was to fire the AD, improve the compliance department by adding more staff, and replacing the outgoing AD with Pat Haden. Haden is a Rhodes Scholar/Rose Bowl & National Championship QB and alumnus all in one. His MO is to win things the right way or not at all.
USC's response to sanctions was to fire the AD, improve the compliance department by adding more staff, and replacing the outgoing AD with Pat Haden. Haden is a Rhodes Scholar/Rose Bowl & National Championship QB and alumnus all in one. His MO is to win things the right way or not at all.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 4:45 am to elleshoo9
Why does anyone give a shite about USC anymore?
They have Kiffen = They're fricked.
They have Kiffen = They're fricked.
Posted on 1/6/11 at 6:46 am to RLDSC FAN
early enrollees? more like "all the parollees"
Posted on 1/6/11 at 9:50 am to LSU Acadian
quote:
early enrollees? more like "all the parollees"
Were you trying to be funny? That was so original, did you think that up yourself?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News