Started By
Message
locked post

Remnants of the 1990s NBA are fading fast

Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:25 am
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
18000 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:25 am
LINK

He mostly mentions things from the mid to late 90s, but I never thought about it, but it is. This is when most of us NBA fanatics got hooked to the league.

quote:

1. Gregg Popovich, Phil Jackson and Jerry Sloan These three wise men are among the best coaches in history, but they might be even better entertainers. All three have reached basketball infallibility and are so comfortable with what they have given the game that they just say the darnedest things. Whether it is Jerry Sloan telling the media that no one wants to see players out there “jackpotting around” or Pop dropping a “Geez, oh wiz” in a post-game rant, or Phil meowing at his players, there will never again be an Old Man’s Club quite like this ever again.


Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:27 am to
Good. The 1990s NBA was a horrible era for basketball. The only good things about the NBA back then was the NBA on NBC and Michael Jordan. Besides that, it sucked.
Posted by xenythx
Member since Dec 2007
33251 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:31 am to
What the hell does that Peja thing have to do with the 90s NBA?
Posted by UFownstSECsince1950
Member since Dec 2009
32813 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:32 am to
quote:

Good. The 1990s NBA was a horrible era for basketball. The only good things about the NBA back then was the NBA on NBC and Michael Jordan. Besides that, it sucked.


false.

the 90's were awesome. the dream teams, the ending of magic/bird careers, hakeem and the rockets back-to-back, stockton/malone/hornaceck and the jazz, shaq bringing the rim down, reggie miller/knicks, young AI, kobe, penny, hill, etc etc I could go on forever
Posted by Richard Seymours Jab
Member since Nov 2010
608 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:36 am to
quote:

Good. The 1990s NBA was a horrible era for basketball. The only good things about the NBA back then was the NBA on NBC and Michael Jordan. Besides that, it sucked.


Yea, f--- intense rivalries!!
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288899 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:43 am to
quote:

Good. The 1990s NBA was a horrible era for basketball. The only good things about the NBA back then was the NBA on NBC and Michael Jordan. Besides that, it sucked.


lol
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:46 am to
quote:

lol


It was a watered down era for basketball. The '80s was so much stronger, it's not even funny. It's only recently that the NBA is finally starting to get better again with a lot of young budding stars across the league.
This post was edited on 12/31/10 at 12:48 am
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59049 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:48 am to
quote:

The 1990s NBA was a horrible era for basketball


Completely disagree, the 90's was a great era for the NBA
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:50 am to
On court basketball was better in the 90's.

However presentation of games is much better now, but that really goes without saying.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288899 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:54 am to
the 80's were better, it doesnt mean the 90's sucked.


there was Jordan and then a lot of other great super stars.

the 80's was pretty top heavy. Great rivalries, with the same old teams.

i dont see how the 90's was watered down. Every year a diffrerent team was challenging the bulls, not only in the East, but in the finals.


in the 80s it was LAL and BOS, with a little DET and PHI mixed in. Top heavy. If anything, after the top teams, the rest of the league was watered down in the 80's.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55755 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:58 am to
quote:

However presentation of games is much better now, but that really goes without saying.



Good God no.



About the league being "watered down" -- that wasn't the case at all. Sure, there was one consistently elite team throughout the decade, but there was a lot of talent league-wide. People often point to the emphasis on defense as evidence the product wasn't good, but it was more of a reflection of the NBA becoming a big man's league -- Hakeem, Ewing, Robinson, Shaq, Duncan later, Malone, Kemp. This era and the '80s has/had more elite wing players (scorers), which is more exciting for casual fans to watch.
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:03 am to
quote:

Good God no.



I don't know about you but I prefer to be able to read graphics that are brought up on screen and to be able to clearly see what's going on on the court. Maybe you prefer blurry picture and hard to read infographics.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55755 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:04 am to
quote:

I don't know about you but I prefer to be able to read graphics that are brought up on screen and to be able to clearly see what's going on on the court. Maybe you prefer blurry picture and hard to read infographics.



This thread is about the '90s; not the '70s.
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:08 am to
if you watch some of the original broadcasts of games from 91 and 92 and then compared it to broadcasts of today, you notice the differences. Goes for all sports really.
Posted by thatguyrightthere
Member since Mar 2010
3674 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:13 am to
quote:

if you watch some of the original broadcasts of games from 91 and 92 and then compared it to broadcasts of today, you notice the differences

Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:14 am to
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55755 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:16 am to
quote:

if you watch some of the original broadcasts of games from 91 and 92 and then compared it to broadcasts of today, you notice the differences. Goes for all sports really.



What you see on YouTube is not how it appeared back then. Videos degrade over time. The only thing that's significantly better is the score overlay consistently being on the screen.

Otherwise, we're stuck with the shite ESPN/ABC brings us -- Pussy Cat Dolls intros, highlight videos with crappy rap songs, an overabundance of sponsorships filling telecasts, Stuart Scott, Al Michaels, numerous technical errors during telecasts (they've gotten better with this), general inconsistencies with their presentation, etc.
This post was edited on 12/31/10 at 1:18 am
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59049 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:19 am to
quote:

we're stuck with the shite ESPN/ABC brings us


Agreed, The NBA on NBC was superior to what ESPN presents
Posted by thatguyrightthere
Member since Mar 2010
3674 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:19 am to
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:23 am to
quote:

Pussy Cat Dolls intros, highlight videos with crappy rap songs, an overabundance of sponsorships filling telecasts, Stuart Scott, Al Michaels, numerous technical errors during telecasts (they've gotten better with this)


I overlook/ignore most of that stuff anyways. I meant with the actual in game information/broadcast. We have more/better camera angles now which I personally like.

But speaking of Stuart Scott, does anyone dislike him as much as I do? The guy acted like he was this badass for so long and that he was just like the athletes he covered. Then when it came time for him to show any sort of athletic acumen, he fricks up his eye. You'd think he would learn his lesson, but nope, he does the same shitty schtick to make himself sound cooler and acts cocky around athletes who shite more athleticism than he has.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram