Started By
Message

re: Shooting Dogs

Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:11 pm to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81741 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

The difference in ideology here is that you fail to see that the owner was the one who ultimately decided to throw away the dog's life. This holds true wether they decide to let the dog roam free on a state hwy or on my lease.
No, not really. The difference is, the 18 wheeler driver had no intent to kill. You did. Reasonable people don't shoot pets no matter how irresponsible the owner may be. The owner did not kill his dog. You did.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48952 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:14 pm to
Sorry, but when I put the time and money into my deer place only to have hunts ruined and deer run off by dogs; it's open season. Call me selfish or a murderer but that my opinion.


If it's a lab or something that's obviously a friendly dog that happened to get lose once then I'll do the right thing and try to help it home.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166508 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

AlxTgr



Would you allow your 13 yr old daughter to go hang out in the ghetto at 3 in the morning?
Posted by VanRIch
Wherever
Member since Sep 2007
10478 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:16 pm to
Glad I could spark a little debate on this slow afternoon. I guess you can call me wrong, but IMO, the only thing wrong with killing a dog, is if it's a dog that belongs to someone and it was an honest mistake that they let it roam free...once, maybe twice. These dogs are always on our land. I'm not some View-watching, tree hugging dog lover. So in my mind, a stray dog is no different than any other animal, albeit a racoon, armadillo or anything else. People shoot hogs for ruining something they invest money in; crops, hunting, etc. Why is it different just because it's a dog?
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

. Reasonable people don't shoot pets no matter how irresponsible the owner may be


Emotional irrational people who endear less evolved animals with human cognition and emotion are unable to see that a pet that is uncontrolled and destructive is a pest. It is not my responsibility to fence 1000 acres so a dog cant get it, it is the owners responsibility to control the animal. Refusal to be responsible for the dog and controll it leaves the property owner with two options, 1. accept the abuse of thier rights and proerty, or 2. protect them.


The pussification of America has too many people willing to accept the first option so they dont hurt someones feelings.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram