How many times has this board had this discussion? This is getting old--but one more time, Crowton has had plenty of time, 4 years, only one good year, the very first, when he inherited a 5th year QB he did not develop. He is supposed to develop QB's & call plays. He has done both very poorly & it is time for him to go. Hopefully, Les will take care of business & get a new OC after the Cotton Bowl.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by aglandry

lafayette

Member since Oct 2008

2574 posts

Posted on 12/20/10 at 10:06 am to rjokerlsu

quote:
How many times has this board had this discussion? This is getting old--but one more time, Crowton has had plenty of time, 4 years, only one good year, the very first, when he inherited a 5th year QB he did not develop. He is supposed to develop QB's & call plays. He has done both very poorly & it is time for him to go. Hopefully, Les will take care of business & get a new OC after the Cotton Bowl.

Don't forget "Stud the Dud." We had one good O-Line(2007) that had been coached by Searles and since then our O-Line with "Stud" has been downhill for the most part.Just look at Auburn and Oregon and see what an O-Line can do for a team.Newton's O-Line gives him enough time that he could read a book. Oregon's O-Line opens holes that you could drive a truck through.

This post was edited on 12/20/10 at 10:17 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by RANDY44

Member since Aug 2005

9572 posts

Posted on 12/20/10 at 11:02 am to rjokerlsu

quote:
This is getting old--but one more time, Crowton has had plenty of time, 4 years, only one good year, the very first, when he inherited a 5th year QB he did not develop.

And an ultra-talented backup who could have won in spite of Crowton as well. Funny thing is, if RP had stayed this whole Crowton issue would only just now be taking off instead of being real,real old.

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board