Started By
Message

re: A&M to SEC Question

Posted on 12/10/10 at 7:06 pm to
Posted by LgeauxStigersU
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
23 posts
Posted on 12/10/10 at 7:06 pm to
The SEC should of been smart about the whole thing by adding a few schools. Revenue would of been off the charts, and the SEC would be DOMINANT in just about everything for decades. Not to mention, the SEC would increase their academic reputation. I'd say the SEC drops A&M and does this instead:

Add:
UNC
Virginia Tech
Georgia Tech
Florida State
Clemson

Remove: Miss. State

Change East and West divisions to North and South.

SEC North:

Clemson
Arkansas
Kentucky
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Virginia Tech

SEC South:

Auburn
FSU
Georgia Tech
LSU
Alabama
UF
UGA
Ole Miss
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112810 posts
Posted on 12/10/10 at 7:15 pm to
you do realize MSU probably would have beaten every ACC team you just mentioned this year?
Posted by RhodeIslandRed
Adrift Off the Spanish Main
Member since Aug 2009
3175 posts
Posted on 12/10/10 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Add:
UNC
Virginia Tech
Georgia Tech
Florida State
Clemson


Georgia Tech was a charter member of the SEC, but quit. Florida State had their chance several years ago, but Bobby Bowden was afraid of the competition. There is no way that I want either of those wuss schools anywhere near the SEC other than as our bitches in bowl games.

Did you ever stop to consider that the only teams you mentioned that would bring anything to the SEC are UNC and VT? Clemson, FSU and Georgia Tech would be welfare cases.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram