Started By
Message

re: SEC refs have no idea WTF theyre doing

Posted on 9/7/10 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 6:45 pm to
Nope, they were yugoslavian...
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

how bad is this gonna get?


bad
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 6:51 pm to
So no one knows if the breaking the goal plane rule would be in affect here?
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21687 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

When the ball crosses the plane, even if his foot doesn't touch the line, doesn't that make it a touchback? Or is that the NFL?


Pretty sure that once the ball crosses the plane in college, it's a touchback. In the NFL, I believe it's the opposite...the player's feet have to be in the endzone while in contact with the ball for it to be a touchback.
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

It wasn't a touchback until the ball was downed. Once LSU batted the ball back into the field of play without touching it, UNC could have picked the ball up and run with it. So, the referees did the right thing by throwing the bean bag into the endzone (as they both did) and waiting for the ball to be downed.



well, maybe Im wrong then. in the screencap below, from the NCAA 2009 rules PDF, I read 6B to mean, the ball is dead when it breaks the plane.

LSU is the attacking team, they put it behind UNCs goal line, therefore the ball is dead.

Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
204378 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

You are an idiot troll


And YOU are a blind homer. LSU won the game. WHY bitch about the refs????
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:00 pm to
It wouldn't have been lsu's ball even if it wasn't a touchback
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21687 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

LSU is the attacking team, they put it behind UNCs goal line, therefore the ball is dead.


The rule states "It is a touchback when a kick becomes dead by rule...etc." The ball isn't dead in the endzone until it hits the ground.
Posted by BACONisMEATcandy
Member since Dec 2007
46645 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:03 pm to
FWIW I interpret it the same way you do shake
Posted by RPC4LSU
Thibodaux, LA
Member since Jan 2006
1953 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

And YOU are a blind homer. LSU won the game. WHY bitch about the refs????
Oh no, I am intimidated by the all caps response. How can I answer? You stupid POS. I am complaining about the refs because they consistently make BLATANT bad calls against LSU. You are a constant ref apologist that thinks they never make a mistake unless it is in LSU's favor.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21687 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

It wouldn't have been lsu's ball even if it wasn't a touchback


This is the way I interpret it as well. However, if a UNC player possessed the ball (picked it up and ran with it), then fumbled it, and LSU recovered; would the ball have been LSU's then?
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33986 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

It wouldn't have been lsu's ball even if it wasn't a touchback
he signaled LSU ball because a UNC player made contact with the ball
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
204378 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

How can I answer? You stupid POS


Answer with this


quote:

I am complaining about the refs because they consistently make BLATANT bad calls against LSU



AND THIS



quote:

You are a constant ref apologist that thinks they never make a mistake unless it is in LSU's favor.


This is bullshite. I am tired of people thinking that EVERY game LSU losses its the refs fault. And now LSU wins a game and people still bitch about the refs.
Posted by geauxtigahs87
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
26275 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

I am complaining about the refs because they consistently make BLATANT bad calls against LSU.

I hear you, but LSU isn't the only team in the SEC getting the short end of the stick with incompetent officiating. And if you want your argument to hold more water, I'd first of all accept that position.

Believe me though, it pisses me off too that what is supposed to be the best conference in the NCAA can't even get fair officiating on a consistent basis.
This post was edited on 9/7/10 at 7:23 pm
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

he signaled LSU ball because a UNC player made contact with the ball


which means we're right back to them not knowing what the rule is.

- either its dead when it breaks the plane, and the refs should have blown it dead and given it to UNC (which is how I understand it) or...

- UNC is given a chance to return it, which 37 did, but then lost it to LSU.

the refs didnt blow it dead, or give it to LSU.


and let me just say again, Im not bitching, i know this play meant nothing. what bothers me is that an SEC crew cant even get the most basic calls right under optimum circumstances.

Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

Believe me though, it pisses me off too that what is supposed to be the best conference in the NCAA can even get fair officiating on a consistent basis.

Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
5704 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:25 pm to
BTW. Did you know that absolutely no penalties were called on Ole Miss against Jacksonville St. in an entire regulation game and double overtime! SEC officials?
Posted by deSandman
Member since Mar 2007
969 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

This is the way I interpret it as well. However, if a UNC player possessed the ball (picked it up and ran with it), then fumbled it, and LSU recovered; would the ball have been LSU's then?

At least in Louisiana middle school football, no. I returned some punts was back in the day and remember being instructed to just grab the ball and run with it if the kicking team touched it but didn't down it, because no matter what happened the receiving team can get it at the spot of the touch.
However I didn't return punts in highschool, and obviously not in college or the NFL, so I'm not sure.
This seems to agree with me
https://www.answerbag.com/q_view/425369
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62431 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 7:58 pm to
[quote]At least in Louisiana middle school football, no. I returned some punts was back in the day and remember being instructed to just grab the ball and run with it if the kicking team touched it but didn't down it, because no matter what happened the receiving team can get it at the spot of the touch.
However I didn't return punts in highschool, and obviously not in college or the NFL, so I'm not sure.
This seems to agree with me
LINK ]

I returned punts in high school, and I concur on this assessment.... for high school.
Posted by Eyeofdtiger75
Keithville, LA
Member since Jul 2004
304 posts
Posted on 9/7/10 at 8:26 pm to
What I am wondering about was the illegal touching penalty that was called on LSU after the punt. Did the player who batted the ball back originally got out of bounds and we didn't see it? I am not sure of the rule, but I have never seen a penalty called for illegal touching on a punt like.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram