Started By
Message

re: Bookie says they won't play

Posted on 9/3/10 at 11:23 am to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56930 posts
Posted on 9/3/10 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Bump!
Looks like the bookie was right several days in advance.


No offense man, but you weren't very specific and predicted the line wouldn't go above 2.5.

quote:

Who said they're losing 6 defensive starters?


quote:

his is 2nd hand. My friend in the face to face this morning did not name numbers of players. He was interested in the line. So his version of 'all players' might = 4 or 5. It might be ALL. I can't vouch for that. But he was absolutely assured that some number of players who have not been officially announced will not play according to inside sources at UNC.
He also said this is problematical for bookies and the line will not move above 2.5.


Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112769 posts
Posted on 9/3/10 at 11:55 am to
quote:

No offense man, but you weren't very specific and predicted the line wouldn't go above 2.5.

No offense taken, but I made no such prediction. I was repeating what I was told. I don't gamble. Never have. Never even bought a lottery ticket. I made the post because at the time there was a lot of speculation about whether or not players would be suspended. One poster up here started a thread saying NO players would be held out by UNC.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram