- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

the last trip
Posted on 7/30/10 at 10:25 am
Posted on 7/30/10 at 10:25 am
Posted on 7/30/10 at 1:40 pm to michael corleone
47 years of fishing. Wonder what he used as fuel all those years? Veg oil? Ethanol?
The world is ending according to this guy.
Yes he lost this season and it sucks but I believe they will be OK by spring time.
The world is ending according to this guy.
Yes he lost this season and it sucks but I believe they will be OK by spring time.
Posted on 7/30/10 at 9:40 pm to pochejp
with all sincerity---you are an idiot.the video does not knock the hydrocarbon industry.it critisizes only BP and only b/c of their grossly negligent conduct.i,like you,am from ascension parish.3 of my uncles and my dad work in the petrochemical industry.i assume you have at least one relative that works in the industry as well.if so and if he died b/c of his plant's grossly negligent conduct would you say "well he drove a car/truck to work everyday ,what do you think it ran on" . this is not about the oil industry,its about corporate greed and cutting corners to maximize profit --oh by the way the company was already making at least 1 billion a quarter in profit.you better fricking wake up and realize that unchecked corporate greed will crash this country's economy and ruin its natural resources.(see enron,worldcom,the banking/lending institution industry and now BP).
Posted on 7/31/10 at 1:01 am to michael corleone
Can someone post a study/survey of any kind that shows how the fish have been affected? All the anecdotal stories I've heard is that the fish are out there in as strong a numbers as any other season.
Posted on 7/31/10 at 10:46 am to C
Posted on 7/31/10 at 10:53 am to michael corleone
The fish, shrimp, crabs, every other fricking that that lives out here is okay as of right now.
Posted on 7/31/10 at 2:48 pm to michael corleone
quote:
with all sincerity---you are an idiot.the video does not knock the hydrocarbon industry.it critisizes only BP and only b/c of their grossly negligent conduct.i,like you,am from ascension parish.3 of my uncles and my dad work in the petrochemical industry.i assume you have at least one relative that works in the industry as well.if so and if he died b/c of his plant's grossly negligent conduct would you say "well he drove a car/truck to work everyday ,what do you think it ran on" . this is not about the oil industry,its about corporate greed and cutting corners to maximize profit --oh by the way the company was already making at least 1 billion a quarter in profit.you better fricking wake up and realize that unchecked corporate greed will crash this country's economy and ruin its natural resources.(see enron,worldcom,the banking/lending institution industry and now BP).
quote:
michael corleone
Uhhh. You're the idiot corleone by believing all the bullshite the media has spewed on this subject.
And yes I do work in the petro chemical industry. Probably longer than you've been breathing so shut your fricking ignorant mouth and actually learn about what you post about.
Posted on 7/31/10 at 4:04 pm to michael corleone
quote:
here you go.starting near the bottom of the food chain.
So hear are the relevant quotes from your link:
"The researchers don't know what impact, if any, the oil is having on the larvae.
"They are alive when collected, and they may lose the oil droplets when they molt, Perry says."
"Fish can metabolize dispersant and oil, Perry says, but crabs may accumulate the hydrocarbons, which could harm their ability to reproduce."
So crabs may have trouble... but it's not a fact and it probably won't be known until next year. I'm going to go ahead and make the prediction that if the crabbers and shrimpers want to work next year, there will be plenty.
Posted on 7/31/10 at 10:11 pm to C
fact---its in the crabs now.fact---salt water fish east juvelile crabs,ergo it will be in the fish's system post consumption.the only "unknown" is the longterm impact on fish and humans that consume fish.wake the frick up.i aint saying that all is lost but all of you cool aid drinkers need to realize that their will be an impact and it will likely be significant,.ask any pogey fisherman in prudhome bay--oh wait you cant bc pogeys dont exist there post valdez.furthermore the thread IS NOT a knock on the hydocarbon industry,only a knock on a grossly negligent company taht has cost this state billions over the next 10 years.
Posted on 7/31/10 at 10:15 pm to michael corleone
quote:
fact---its in the crabs now
And?
quote:fish take shits just like other animals. I don't see how a minute amount of oil in a crab that a fish may eat will end up greatly effecting the taste of the fish.
ergo it will be in the fish's system post consumption.
Again, no one knows how this will end up, but logic is pointing this being on the level of Y2K as far as disasters go. Yes it could have been bad, but we've done a lot to prevent it.
Posted on 7/31/10 at 10:34 pm to C
you are right---everything animals consume they expel via the digestive system.nothing is absorbed.i guess mercury warnings for certain gulf fish are just BS propoganda bc inreality they expel the mercury that they consume via the digestive system.how silly of me.oh and i guess its also foolish to presume that the hydrocrabons will concentrate inn the larger,predator fish simply bc they are consuming multiple crabs.
Posted on 7/31/10 at 10:46 pm to michael corleone
I know it doesn't support your propaganda, but if they are going to find contaminated fish, wouldn't this be best time for that? From this point forward, the oil is being degraded, the crabs are molting, and the fish are shitting. Where are all these contaminated fish? Stop trying to scare people. It only hurts the gulf economy.
Posted on 8/1/10 at 10:41 am to michael corleone
quote:
i guess mercury warnings for certain gulf fish are just BS propoganda bc inreality they expel the mercury that they consume via the digestive system
Aaannnnnd you just lost any shred of credibility thinking the two can be compared
Posted on 8/1/10 at 2:50 pm to Volvagia
tell you what---i will take you dumbasses down there in my fricking bayboat so you can see it first hand.i was in grind isle 5/22 the day they shut it down.i have pics of oil on the beach and the pelicans in 4 bayou pass the day before the oil came through there.i was in port sulphur on 7/6 and saw low tide in the marsh.its unfricking believeable.the oild BELOW the water line is unimaginable.yall obviously dont care or dont think its a big fricking deal.blame the media and the government all you want but they were not operating the rig that caused all of this.you can't crab,shrimp or oyster from 4 bayous east to the state line.thats a fricking fact.yall need to research the effect valdez had on the fish and fishing industry in prudhome bay.this aint the first time oil has polluted an estuary.
Posted on 8/1/10 at 3:21 pm to michael corleone
Free fishing trip! Awesome! Let's wait until the moratorium is lifted, though.
Posted on 8/1/10 at 6:10 pm to michael corleone
I guess you have more credibility than Dr. Overton (Professor Emeritus from LSU) then.
Reason for Optimism
Reason for Optimism
Posted on 8/1/10 at 9:31 pm to michael corleone
The GD fishing industry is going to be fine. I'm so sick of the politically created drama. GET OFF THE MORATORIUM AND GET OFF MY NUTS FEDERAL F'ING GOVERNMENT.
Posted on 8/1/10 at 11:08 pm to michael corleone
quote:
yall need to research the effect valdez had on the fish and fishing industry in prudhome bay.
And there isn't a single commonality other than the fact that oil spilled between the two.
1) The type of oil spilled were polar opposites, with the Alaskan oil a thick sticky mess that stuck to everything, and with the Louisiana oil spill having only a relatively small fraction of the oil forming that tar like substance with large portions of the oil being volatile and evaporating out of the water.
2) The local ecology in the two systems are vastly different, with the Alaskan sea life being relatively sparse and by extension dramatically more sensitive to stress
3) The volume of oil spilled, while less overall, took place very rapidly and it was into a very confined area....
4) Which meant there was zero wave action. There were no major waves to help break it up, and introduce oxygen to break it down. It just sat there waiting for someone to manually scoop it up, which also took a fair amount of effort to do due to the logistical headaches caused by the remoteness of the site
But yeah, you sure are sounding extremely informed with all of your "research" of the effects.
And you can have all of the pictures you want from "grind isle" during the worst of it....that doesn't suggest that this will cause massive impact in the years to come as far as the seafood industry is concerned....other than the public perception that the food is contaminated in spite of frequent testing of the catch.
And just to head off the little straw man you started to pull, you do realize that while you think the blame ends at Transocean/BP (specifically who deserves it more between the two is still up in the air IMO, in spite of the congressional hearing witch hunts just looking for stuff to stick on BP), that doesn't mean that the government/media didn't make it worse.
And if the main problem really does turn out to be long term perception rather than facts....then yeah, that ball is pretty much all in the media's court. Just because they aren't liable for those damages doesn't mean they don't cause them.
Posted on 8/2/10 at 9:18 pm to Volvagia
LINK
you realize that all of your positions are based upon the "smell test" and the "unknown" longterm effects of the dispursant/oil.that sounds like the scientific method at work. dont try to get in a "mine is bigger than yours contest".i assure you that i am as old,educated and wealthy as you.obviously you "trust" corporations--i do not.bottom line--a corporation's board of directors has one obligation-----ensure the profitability of the the shareholder's holdings.they do not owe ANY obligations to employees,the public or the government.greed wins every frickin time and if you think that is not accurate ,then you are all naive.BP has actuaries and accountants crunching numbers everyday figuring out the cheapest method to get out of this jam.they WILL take that path despite promises to cleanup every drop and make people whole. i am ready to fish,but i wont eat one for a while--regardless of whether or not they pass the "smell test".
you realize that all of your positions are based upon the "smell test" and the "unknown" longterm effects of the dispursant/oil.that sounds like the scientific method at work. dont try to get in a "mine is bigger than yours contest".i assure you that i am as old,educated and wealthy as you.obviously you "trust" corporations--i do not.bottom line--a corporation's board of directors has one obligation-----ensure the profitability of the the shareholder's holdings.they do not owe ANY obligations to employees,the public or the government.greed wins every frickin time and if you think that is not accurate ,then you are all naive.BP has actuaries and accountants crunching numbers everyday figuring out the cheapest method to get out of this jam.they WILL take that path despite promises to cleanup every drop and make people whole. i am ready to fish,but i wont eat one for a while--regardless of whether or not they pass the "smell test".
Posted on 8/2/10 at 9:38 pm to michael corleone
quote:
make people whole
From what everyone is saying, they are paying people very well for their claims.
quote:To extent reasonable you can be damn sure the government is holding them to a very high standard.
cleanup every drop
quote:EPA did the testing. The dispercent is fine. The oil is the toxic part.
longterm effects of the dispursant/oil.
quote:
i wont eat one for a while--regardless of whether or not they pass the "smell test".
Saltwater is more toxic to you than oil. You aren't going to die from eating oil contaminated fish (not that they have found any from this spill)
Popular
Back to top

2





