Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Superstars took less money to win

Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:34 pm
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55875 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:34 pm
Isn't this what professional sports fans have been clamoring for?
Posted by PsawyerIsmywife
N.C. baby
Member since Dec 2009
107 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:35 pm to
which one took less money?
Posted by dizerik
Lake Chuck
Member since Mar 2009
8435 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

which one took less money?



Posted by geauxlsu07
Adirondack Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
35865 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

which one took less money?


they all are going to take less than the max
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22201 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Isn't this what professional sports fans have been clamoring for?
Only if they take less to play for YOUR team.

If not, they're selfish, losers, etc etc etc

If you wouldve said Lebron would take $30 million less a year ago to play for a better team, NOBODY wouldve believed it
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:38 pm to
But....But....he didn't stay in Cleveland!!
Posted by List Eater
Htown
Member since Apr 2005
23698 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

If you wouldve said Lebron would take $30 million less a year ago to play for a better team, NOBODY wouldve believed it



which is why he's earning my respect tonight.

people going to hate either way, but damn i don't see how he's taking the easy way out
This post was edited on 7/8/10 at 9:40 pm
Posted by PsawyerIsmywife
N.C. baby
Member since Dec 2009
107 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:39 pm to
ok.
This post was edited on 7/8/10 at 9:41 pm
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55875 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

If you wouldve said Lebron would take $30 million less a year ago to play for a better team, NOBODY wouldve believed it



Which is why I'm warming up to the whole thing. I'll root against them because they'll be favorites, always on TV, and have a huge bandwagon, etc. But I support the principle behind what they did.

And frick the Knicks.
Posted by TEXASTIGER22
H-TOWN
Member since Feb 2007
11534 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:52 pm to
Jeff Bagwell was the pioneer
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22201 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Which is why I'm warming up to the whole thing. I'll root against them because they'll be favorites, always on TV, and have a huge bandwagon, etc. But I support the principle behind what they did.

And frick the Knicks.
I agree
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13594 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

which is why he's earning my respect tonight.

people going to hate either way, but damn i don't see how he's taking the easy way out

This.
Posted by tiger2012
bossier city/Los Angeles/Atlanta
Member since Sep 2006
4493 posts
Posted on 7/8/10 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

which one took less money?


they took about a million/yr less to play together.

so instead of 5 years and 85 million. it'd be 5 years and 80 million.

Wade and Bosh win.

Lebron loses alot by playing tag-a-long. He's not going anywhere near billionaire status or half a billionaire.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram