Started By
Message

re: Bush speaks on SC

Posted on 6/17/10 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36162 posts
Posted on 6/17/10 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

It's a pissing contest between the NCAA and USC about USC's lax policies regarding compliance, and what the NCAA viewed as a lack of cooperation in it's investigation.

There was more than a hint of vindictiveness in the sanctions. 30 scholarships is probably excessive.



It may be a pissing match from the perspective of USC - but the NCAA has a policy of making punishment worse for non-compliance and obstruction.

Which is why I don't understand the consistent USC policy of bull-headed denial and resistance.

But go ahead and do like Bama did - pretend nothing wrong happened and scream about how unfair the NCAA can be - the NCAA can be inconsistent but that's not the point to argue when you get caught doing something wrong
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 6/17/10 at 1:37 pm to
what was the monetary amount in the Lester Earl deal? the total violations? were we considered a repeat violator?

just wondering, b/c that sure as hell seemed like a witch hunt. It's not like USC is the only school to think sanctions are too harsh.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram