- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Will USC sanctions benefit LSU this recruiting class?
Posted on 6/9/10 at 11:49 pm
Posted on 6/9/10 at 11:49 pm
Just wanted to throw it out there. Any homegrown talent that USC is interested in that this might have an effect on, or some other national recruits that might cross USC off the list, if this 2 year postseason ban is true
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:00 am to bmy
I think Rasco has interest in them as well. Unfortunately, we stay east with our recruiting and don't bring in any California talent, so outside of this year, I don't think it will help us all too much
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:02 am to GeauxAggie972
It'll definitely help UCLA
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:34 am to Harv1790
Posted on 6/10/10 at 5:02 am to glenoaks
Sorry guys, Barkley's all SC, sanctions or not. 
Posted on 6/10/10 at 6:11 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
Sorry guys, Barkley's all SC, sanctions or not.
What a waste of his time though, he's not going to win a national championship or play in the Rose bowl if the 2 year post season ban is true. I expect him to be gone after his Junior year.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 7:58 am to Harv1790
It really depends on the number of schollys taken this year. Most of the kids recruited this year will not see the field while under the post-season ban. It will only affect the number of kids USC can sign. Depth will be an issue for SC in the years to come.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:24 am to loweralabamatrojan
I think that helps with Mickey Johnson.
I wonder how the guys that are already committed are taking this news and what their plans are....
I wonder how the guys that are already committed are taking this news and what their plans are....
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:40 am to Prominentwon
I'm sure Kiffen is selling the fact the sanctions will not affect their playing time at SC and with less depth the kids they do sign will see big minutes. My question is are recruits too stupid to see thru what the SC staff is selling? My guess is no.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 9:22 am to flyingtiger
What about Mitch Mustain. I think he could transfer and play right away because of the probation.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 9:35 am to tigerguy121
I think M. Johnson and Rasco were the only two LA kids looking at U$C this year.
However, I'm wondering if it will help or hurt in the long run. Ed O is always in LA recruiting our guys and if they have only a certain number of players they can persue, it makes me wonder if he will be here concentrating on our stud players harder.
However, I'm wondering if it will help or hurt in the long run. Ed O is always in LA recruiting our guys and if they have only a certain number of players they can persue, it makes me wonder if he will be here concentrating on our stud players harder.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 9:41 am to flyingtiger
quote:
My question is are recruits too stupid to see thru what the SC staff is selling? My guess is no.
My guess is YES. Well, maybe not stupidity as much as willful blindness. Lane Kiffin and Ed Orgeron are two of the slimiest bastards to ever walk this planet -- and that's not opinion; empirically, they're the slimiest -- and any recruit willing to listen to their overhyped bullshite has GOT to know he's getting the ole-song-and-dance. Yet, these repugnant little imbeciles continue to get good recruits. It's fascinating to watch . . . like a train wreck.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 10:57 am to SHELTONLSU
if players can transfer out of programs without penalty due to NCAA sanctions, why not pick up the phone and call some of their sophs and Jrs?
esp guys we recruited that picked SC.
raid the cupboard!
esp guys we recruited that picked SC.
raid the cupboard!
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:11 am to tigerguy121
itll probably help with hilliard even though he verballed already. usc was still lookin at him pretty aggressively...
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:14 am to BobBoucher
I dont see how it hurts us. Any prospects who were considering USC, will probably move SC down on their list. We might not land a prospect directly because of this, but it might take the edge off of louisiana recruits thining about Southern Cal.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:24 am to BulkLogan1
I would take CJ Gable in a heartbeat
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:39 pm to glenoaks
I don't understand why big minutes and early time would be a good sell tool to a recruit.
You would be playing for NOTHING!
Now if you grew up there and love USC, I understand that, but going there from out of state to play for nothing
You would be playing for NOTHING!
Now if you grew up there and love USC, I understand that, but going there from out of state to play for nothing
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:13 am to the LSUSaint
Down 30 schollies over the next 3 years will limit who they can go after. I suspect they will try to lock up their local, natural recruiting area and not go so nation-wide.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 2:10 am to tigerguy121
USC's days as a national recruiting power may have ended. With the re-emergence of UCLA as a PAC-10 power, they will have to battle it out for local talent. The only advantage USC had over UCLA was tradition and now that is tainted.
Back to top

6





