Started By
Message
locked post

Environmentalists with oil on their hands

Posted on 6/6/10 at 7:06 am
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
41595 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 7:06 am
Posted by CougarBait
on catnip in a cougar's den
Member since Jun 2007
2023 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 8:22 am to
Yeah right. This is all their fault.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112662 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Yeah right. This is all their fault


Completely? No.

Majority? No.

Partially? No doubt.

This is not a Willie Hutton "that's where the money is" issue. O & G is out that deep because that's where federal policies have forced them to. Permits for onshore or shallow water drilling are more difficult because of NIMBYs (either aesthetic or environmental). It is cheaper (and also safer) to drill on or close to shore. The current leak would have been capped over a month ago if it was on land or in the shallows.

That is the main point that is being made and it is a valid one.
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
13013 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 8:51 am to
There is a big difference between a "NIMBY" and an "environmental wacko".

quote:

The current leak would have been capped over a month ago if it was on land or in the shallows.


On land you are probably right, but in shallow water? That is highly debatable.
Posted by knockers
Austin
Member since Dec 2009
464 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 9:16 am to
Divers, Nimwit, could have fixed in hours in shallow water.
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
41595 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Divers, Nimwit, could have fixed in hours in shallow water.

Exactly.
It must be a bitch for some to live in a world of denial.
Posted by ShrSteamer
Shreveport, LA
Member since Feb 2006
257 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 10:11 am to
LOL
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 10:25 am to
Two can play this game...

If pathetic whackos such as yourself hadn't supported big oil whores for positions of power we'd be much farther along in our conversion to clean sources of power.
Posted by DeeHorton
Member since Jan 2009
2105 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 10:35 am to
You idiots keeping on repeating your talking points are not making an impact on anyone with more than half a brain.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112662 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 10:42 am to
quote:

You idiots keeping on repeating your talking points are not making an impact on anyone with more than half a brain.


That's not a very nice thing to say to Rex. He means well.
Posted by seawolf06
NH
Member since Oct 2007
8159 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 10:51 am to
Ixtoc I was in less than 200 ft of water and it still leaked for 9 months. The only solution: drill a relief well.

If we could continue to drill on land where we have the capability to stop a leak, everyone would be much safer. The problem is no one wants that in their backyards.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61281 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:12 am to
Yeah, it would be nice if California and Florida would allow for just a little more drilling close to their coast. They have no problem using oil, but they like to leave the risk and problems to other states to worry about as far as drilling.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:13 am to
Blaming environmentalists for this disaster requires some of the most convoluted logic imaginable.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61281 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:21 am to
I wouldn't blame it on them, but as the other poster tried to explain, the ways in which big oil has been forced to drill now, is partially the fault of environmentalist. It is much safer and cheaper to drill in shallow water or on land.

Yes we would love to all find that magic unicorn that shits clean energy, but until that happens oil is our best option. How about making it easier to get? California has a shite ton of oil off of their coast, but they think they are too good to allow drilling. Of course as state they probably use more fuel than any other.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:35 am to
quote:

It is much safer and cheaper to drill in shallow water or on land.


First off, the cost doesn't matter, as BP would turn a profit drilling pretty much anywhere their drills can reach.

Second off, BP has demonstrated time and time again that safety doesn't matter either, as two of their last three major accidents have occurred.. on land.

Thirdly, even if BP were allowed to drill off the California coast, what's to stop them from deepwater drilling in the GoM? They'd simply drill in both places as long as both are profitable.
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34203 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:37 am to
After this disaster I cant see FL or CA letting oil rigs drill in their backyard.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:38 am to
they don't realize it's all their fault?
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34203 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:43 am to
Bay, did you get the links for volunteer opportunities?
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:45 am to
yeah, I signed up for most of the websites that were taking volunteers.
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34203 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 11:47 am to
I'll be back down there tomorrow evening for work. The american public would be outraged at BPs effort if they knew what was going on.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram