Started By
Message
locked post

Vitter Says Response to Oil Spill Complete failure

Posted on 5/28/10 at 10:32 am
Posted by bayourant
Homer
Member since Aug 2005
34445 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 10:32 am
quote:

'A Complete Failure' [Rich Lowry]



Just got off the phone with Sen. Vitter, who calls the effort to protect Louisiana's coast and marshes "a complete failure." He says the feds are poorly organized and BP has "no sense of urgency." He says it's not organized "like a flood fight or military battle," but like "a hodgepodge or seminar."

He continues, "The president and Admiral Allen need to set up a clear line of command with a commander in each parish waging this battle when incoming oil is identified." Instead, according to Vitter, it takes "three sign-offs" and other bureaucratic rigmarole before anything happens. Emblematic of the confusion is the plan to build barrier berms: "After weeks of foot dragging, they approved 2 percent of the plan." He says some of these barriers can be built quickly, because they are expanding on already existing barrier islands. He notes that the Corps has issued permits for 45 percent of the plan, which makes it inexplicable that only 2 percent has been formally approved.

There's also a problem with availability of boom and other supplies and "getting it to where it needs to go and quickly deployed." Again, he says, "we need a significant Coast Guard commander joined at the hip with the parish president" in every parish threatened by oil. Asked if he still has confidence in Admiral Allen, he says he gave him high marks in the aftermath of Katrina and also does in this crisis, but "he has a lot of work still to do to organize this response."


05/28 11:22 AMShare


LINK
Posted by Tommy Patel
Member since Apr 2006
7558 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 10:40 am to
didn't Carville already make these points in his Rant? I find it interesting that both political party's (at least in Louisiana) are all saying the same thing (for the moment).
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31768 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 10:44 am to
It's really easy to bitch about this

That much is for sure
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61304 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 10:47 am to
It is true what he is saying, but sometimes I wish all of these politicians would shut the fck up for a while.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 10:55 am to
Don't really give a damn what David Vitter has to say...........Ever.
Posted by lsutigers1992
Member since Mar 2006
25317 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 11:15 am to
Does Vitter still think that the biggest issue facing this country is gay marriage, like he said a couple of months after Katrina?
Posted by bayourant
Homer
Member since Aug 2005
34445 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Don't really give a damn what David Vitter has to say...........Ever.


Well I suppose the laternative is he could say nothing and not alert the country to the problem
Posted by Northwestern tiger
Long Island NY
Member since Oct 2005
23750 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 11:21 am to
quote:

and not alert the country to the problem


i guess we have to say thank you sen vitter for alerting us to the oil spill, noone was paying attention

Posted by Fenwick86
Member since May 2007
3849 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

'A Complete Failure'


He must have been talking about his own political career.
Posted by LSUdm21
Member since Nov 2008
17486 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 2:58 pm to
Someone should ask Vitter why the frick he's fighting FOR the oil companies to cap their fines. frick that dude.
Posted by Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Lafayette LA
Member since Nov 2005
14090 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Don't really give a damn what David Vitter has to say...........Ever.


Posted by Big McLargeHuge
Member since Jun 2008
634 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 4:25 pm to
Is this the same David Vitter that wants to limit BP's liability to the last 4 quarters profit?
Posted by ottothewise
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

didn't Carville already make these points in his Rant?


that's where Vitter learned about it all.

Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28165 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

Is this the same David Vitter that wants to limit BP's liability to the last 4 quarters profit?


$20Billion? Thats a pretty high limit. Most were predicting around 10 to 15. Where did he say this?
Posted by Big McLargeHuge
Member since Jun 2008
634 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 7:48 pm to
Vitter pushes for BP bailout

We have a $2.4 billion a year seafood industry. Those 3 parishes get $3.5 billion a year in tourism. Let's call that $6 billion a year and say it's reduced to $3 billion a year for the next decade because of this. Even if it is enough, there should be no cap. Irresponsible companies need to be punished without big government intervening or it creates moral hazard.
Posted by UnclassyStudent
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
2894 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Is this the same David Vitter that wants to limit BP's liability to the last 4 quarters profit?


I believe there was a bill introduced that would change the liability limit from $75mil to the last 4 quarters of the company's profits (about $20bil for BP last year).
Vitter then introduced a bill that would raise the liability for oil companies from $75mil to $150mil.
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
13013 posts
Posted on 5/28/10 at 8:18 pm to
Vitter's bill would place the cap at $150 million OR the last four quarters profits, whichever is higher.

Obviously, for a company like BP, 4 quarters of profit is quite substantial.
Posted by Things and stuff
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
3579 posts
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:47 am to
I agree with the criticisms of the Obama administration. It seems lackluster.

However, I suspect the only motivation our state politicians have are A) to look good by putting others down and B) to get as free of access to federal money as possible, with as little "red tape" as possible.

The way our coastal restoration program has been run for the past few years has been a complete joke. It is so lush with federal monies and yet it has double accounting involved all over the place and is switched from DNR to the governor's office so they can spend it and then back to DNR after the year is over, for the sake of keeping it legal.



Posted by tigerpurple84
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
971 posts
Posted on 5/29/10 at 8:00 am to
Vitter is just p!ssed because it means less petroleum and that means breast implant materials are in short supply for his ladies.

I'd say the lack of petro-chemical products like condoms make him upset too, but I'm pretty sure he thinks that divine intervention keeps only disease-free prostitutes from his loins.
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 5/29/10 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Irresponsible companies need to be punished without big government intervening or it creates moral hazard.


I wish there was more of this said before we bailed out GM and the Banks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram