Started By
Message

re: QB Play: NOT the Major Problem w/the Offense (statistical support)

Posted on 4/21/10 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 4/21/10 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

ryanlsu


In actuality, what you are arguing makes very little sense from a statistical standpoint.

You are claiming that Flynn checked the offense out of bad plays and into good plays, thus the disparity between the rush games. Besides the fact that it's such an enormous gap that that seems highly unlikely, then why didn't it positively affect the passing game as much as well?

I mean, theoretically, if Flynn does such a great job of checking into great plays while JJ does poor job of it, shouldn't Flynn's passing numbers be off the charts better than JJ's?
Posted by Tigerloo
Member since Sep 2007
397 posts
Posted on 4/21/10 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

In actuality, what you are arguing makes very little sense from a statistical standpoint.

You are claiming that Flynn checked the offense out of bad plays and into good plays, thus the disparity between the rush games. Besides the fact that it's such an enormous gap that that seems highly unlikely, then why didn't it positively affect the passing game as much as well?

I mean, theoretically, if Flynn does such a great job of checking into great plays while JJ does poor job of it, shouldn't Flynn's passing numbers be off the charts better than JJ's?


Does anyone find it interesting that the rushing offense ranked 90th, but the passing game ranked 97th? Seems like if the "real reason" the offense was so bad was really the rushing game then the passing game would be better??

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram