- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Scott runs a 4.72 and 4.67
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:30 pm
ouch
This post was edited on 2/28/10 at 2:04 pm
9
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:30 pm to danfraz
About what people should have been expecting.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:32 pm to danfraz
carrying those 240 lbs. is a load.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:33 pm to danfraz
quote:
ouch
better than the 4.8 people were expecting
4.7 isn't a horible time for a pure power back
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:33 pm to danfraz
his rivals profile said 4.66 and thats when he was about 25 pounds lighter. I didnt see anyway he'd be much better than that.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
What did Jamal Lewis run?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:36 pm to Slinger16
quote:
What did Jamal Lewis run?
4.37
he's a bad person to compare just about any RB to as a prospect
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:36 pm to Slinger16
As long as he looks good on his agility and explosiveness measures, 4.72 official electronic time is fine for that type of back.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:37 pm to danfraz
No surprise there.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
4.37
Damn, Chuck is screwed.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:37 pm to Tigercat
quote:
As long as he looks good on his agility and explosiveness measures,
one of his broad jumps was sub 9-feet
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:38 pm to Tigercat
and really when does low 4 end speed come in handy when bowling over defenders late in a game for crucial first downs? a lot of fuss about nothing, really.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:40 pm to tubucoco
it's just a measure of overall athletic ability
scott has not done well today
a lot of power backs in this draft, and just about all have tested better (and they were productive, too)
scott has not done well today
a lot of power backs in this draft, and just about all have tested better (and they were productive, too)
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
one of his broad jumps was sub 9-feet
Ouch, but that's why I said measures. Broad jumping is one of them, but that alone doesn't tell the whole story. Scott in his prime was very explosive for his speed level while at LSU. Has a slower RB ever had so many long runs at LSU? (Even if a decent number of them were against lesser competition.)
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:41 pm to Tigercat
quote:
Broad jumping is one of them, but that alone doesn't tell the whole story.
his vertical was 30.5" i believe, which is horrid
quote:
Has a slower RB ever had so many long runs at LSU?
toefield, JV
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
I know, overall times make a difference with contracts, gotta feed his family, well, in this case, Scott's family will be starvin.
This post was edited on 2/28/10 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
Better RB...Scott or Tim Tebow?
Scott - 5'11" 238 4.72, 30.5 vertical, 9.03 jump
Tebow - 6'2" 236 4.70, 38 vertical, 9.07 jump
Just kidding....but Scott's performance blows.
Edited
Scott - 5'11" 238 4.72, 30.5 vertical, 9.03 jump
Tebow - 6'2" 236 4.70, 38 vertical, 9.07 jump
Just kidding....but Scott's performance blows.
Edited
This post was edited on 2/28/10 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
toefield, JV
Justin Vincent in his prime maybe, but he only did it for half a year, Scott did it for longer than a year. (And to further it into the explosiveness discussion, JV did it off his agility that he lost when he fattened up.) Toefield was faster than both, I don't remember what Toefield ran officially, but I considered Toefield a upper 4.5 guy. He had speed and strength. Proved to have no running instincts in the NFL though.
But I would be willing to bet that Scott had more 40+ yard runs in his career than both.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:46 pm to BBATiger
quote:
but Scott's performance will not blow many away
scott is having one of the worst combines for any RB
Posted on 2/28/10 at 1:47 pm to Tigercat
quote:
Scott did it for longer than a year.
no scott had one year of excellent production
quote:
but I considered Toefield a upper 4.5 guy
he ran in the mid 4.6s to low 4.7s
quote:
But I would be willing to bet that Scott had more 40+ yard runs in his career than both.
how many 40+ yard runs did scott have against BCS competition? honest question
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News