- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Ray Nagin headed to Super Bowl XLIV on taxpayers' dime
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:26 pm
"The Saints have come through. I got some good seats," the mayor told WBOK radio.
"I paid for them," Nagin told host Gerod Stevens before correcting himself. "Well, the city paid for them because this is an official visit, a business trip."
LINK
"I paid for them," Nagin told host Gerod Stevens before correcting himself. "Well, the city paid for them because this is an official visit, a business trip."
LINK
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:28 pm to mr. penguin
Dude is going to jail, now its just fricking funny! Jim Letten is slowly working his way to Nagin and trust me, he will get there!
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:29 pm to Paul Greengrass
On the Jindal thread, I do believe this was predicted long beforehand.
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:29 pm to mr. penguin
Impeachment is a formal process in which an elected official is accused of unlawful activity, and which may or may not lead to the removal of that official from office. It is the first of two stages. Impeachment does not necessarily result in removal from office; it is only a legal statement of charges, parallel to an indictment in criminal law. An official who is impeached faces a second legislative vote (whether by the same body or another), which determines conviction, or failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment. Most constitutions require a supermajority to convict. Although the subject of the charge is criminal action, it does not constitute a criminal trial; the only question under consideration is the removal of the individual from office, and the possibility of a subsequent vote preventing the removed official from ever again holding political office in the jurisdiction where he was removed.
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:30 pm to mr. penguin
so the supposed "personal" reason he didn't think he was going to go last week was that he's a cheap bastard that didn't want to pay his own way...shocker there!
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:32 pm to mr. penguin
well the city's team is in the Superbowl. I am diehard conservative, but I think the people that don't want nagin to go, are simply anti nagin.
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:33 pm to sheek
I am anit Nagin, but I'm pretty sure other cities do this too, but I could be wrong. Plus I live in Metairie, so I don't give a rats arse about it
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:43 pm to mr. penguin
Isn't Jindal going to be there as well? Joseph Cao is watching it in the White House with Obama.
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:51 pm to Gtiger9757
quote:
Isn't Jindal going to be there as well
Yes. He paid with money from his campaign fund or whatnot. Big difference between using peoples' tax dollars that should benefit EVERYBODY and using money that was given to you by your supporters for you to benefit YOURSELF with.
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:51 pm to Gtiger9757
yes jindal is going. the state has a stake in the team.
Posted on 2/4/10 at 11:58 pm to yurintroubl
exactly...there is a huge difference between privately donated campaign funding and city issued travel funds. i'm betting nagin was awaiting city council approval of a transfer of funds to provide for his attendance.
Posted on 2/5/10 at 12:01 am to pussywillows
My god every freaking city's team mayor goes to the superbowl. I hate nagin as much as you all, but I am not going to let my hate of nagin dictate if he should head down to south florida. I just hope the city council has master billed everything and not let numbnuts run around southbeach with the city amex.
Posted on 2/5/10 at 12:05 am to mr. penguin
Posted on 2/5/10 at 12:06 am to pussywillows
quote:
there is a huge difference between privately donated campaign funding and city issued travel funds. i'm betting nagin was awaiting city council approval of a transfer of funds to provide for his attendance.
No... I don't think "city issued travel funds" were the issue here...
quote:
"I'm all set with tickets - not tickets - but hotel, plane. I still don't have tickets, but we're going to work on that."
From 1/28/10
I suppose his airfare could have jumped by $900 since then...
ETA:
quote:
let numbnuts run around southbeach with the city amex.
This post was edited on 2/5/10 at 12:09 am
Posted on 2/5/10 at 12:08 am to mr. penguin
I hate politicians more and more each day!!! They just live on us like a bunch of damn leeches!!!
Posted on 2/5/10 at 12:10 am to sheek
quote:
but I think the people that don't want nagin to go, are simply anti nagin.
This
Posted on 2/5/10 at 12:20 am to yurintroubl
my bad...i didn't realize that tickets were his problem. i saw somebody a while back mention that he didn't know if he was going to go, but they didn't specify the reason why. regarding the "amex card" comments, that's all well and good until you have to pay the bill...municipal governments are run on a "line item" basis, meaning all bills are paid out of item specific accounts. so when the amex bill comes due, it would have to be paid out of a travel/meetings type of account. i worked in municipal government budget management/accounting for 12 years. i've seen the bullshite that is manipulated through city councils. it's the main reason i couldn't work there any longer. all in all though, i would have expected all this to be handled in order for nola's mayor to be in attendance.
Posted on 2/5/10 at 12:32 am to FreshPrinceofBR
quote:
but I think the people that don't want nagin to go, are simply anti nagin.
IMO - His residence in Dallas (Frisco) disqualifies him from using the money from the city of New Orleans' coffers. He'll be up Jerry Jones' arse the second his term ends.
Posted on 2/5/10 at 2:56 am to mr. penguin
The mayor of a city with a team in the Super Bowl should be in attendance.
The particular city should pay for the mayor's atttendance.
I hate this particular situation. But, sadly, it is the situation at hand.
The particular city should pay for the mayor's atttendance.
I hate this particular situation. But, sadly, it is the situation at hand.
Popular
Back to top

11







