- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints-Vikings Comparison
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:43 am to mark65mc
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:43 am to mark65mc
as for the running game, the stats are similar
taking out qb sacks for this stat, which is a more accurate reading of the run game
the saints have 1555 yards on 320 carries which is about a 4.8 ypc
the vikings have 1430 yards on 313 carries which is about a 4.6 ypc
so overall the running game is similar. adrian peterson is a home run threat every time he touches the ball, i just cant say that about pierre thomas or mike bell. adrian is also the most physical runner in the game and really wears down a defense. if you think that doesnt matter than you don't know football
taking out qb sacks for this stat, which is a more accurate reading of the run game
the saints have 1555 yards on 320 carries which is about a 4.8 ypc
the vikings have 1430 yards on 313 carries which is about a 4.6 ypc
so overall the running game is similar. adrian peterson is a home run threat every time he touches the ball, i just cant say that about pierre thomas or mike bell. adrian is also the most physical runner in the game and really wears down a defense. if you think that doesnt matter than you don't know football
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:44 am to Flowbie
quote:
so overall the running game is similar. adrian peterson is a home run threat every time he touches the ball, i just cant say that about pierre thomas or mike bell. adrian is also the most physical runner in the game and really wears down a defense. if you think that doesnt matter than you don't know football
you obviously do not watch saints games...
Just give up you friggin noob
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:44 am to Flowbie
quote:
so overall the running game is similar.
That's his way of saying "Saints have better stats here"
This post was edited on 12/1/09 at 12:45 am
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:44 am to Flowbie
Oh, please explain football to me oh great and powerful Flowbie. Because, obviously, you are so wise in the ways of the gridiron.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbow.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbow.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbow.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbow.gif)
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:45 am to Flowbie
i'll take the saints rushing attack.. you guys rely far too much on one guy.. who may pose as a home run threat every time he touches the ball.. but he also poses as a huge fumbling threat as well. lolz.. turn the ball over against the saints and you pay.
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:46 am to Flowbie
quote:
so overall the running game is similar. adrian peterson is a home run threat every time he touches the ball, i just cant say that about pierre thomas or mike bell. adrian is also the most physical runner in the game and really wears down a defense. if you think that doesnt matter than you don't know football
well i can't really refute that. one of the few things i can agree with
Posted on 12/1/09 at 12:48 am to Flowbie
quote:
taking out qb sacks for this stat, which is a more accurate reading of the run game
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure sack yardage is taken away from passing yards in the NFL. Sack yardage is taken away from rushing yards in college.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)