- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

THIS was washington's bowl game.........
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:09 pm
A expect a drop-off/let-down from them. Whether they become bowl elligible is still up in the air.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:09 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
expect a drop-off/let-down from them.
i expect a dropoff b/c LSU was so physical we killed their morale. that's going to be the more common excuse
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:09 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
A expect a drop-off/let-down from them
I see the opposite. I think they just get better.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:10 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
I agree.
Washington was fired up. Anybody can put up a fight really if they want it enough.
Washington was fired up. Anybody can put up a fight really if they want it enough.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:10 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
A expect a drop-off/let-down from them
I hope not. This would make us look real bad.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
If I were you, I wouldnt be hoping for a drop off.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:12 pm to Udub22
i'm not, but don't take last night as some great sign
we routinely do this and pump up teams we should have beaten by more
we have 2 excuses
1. the title of this thread (which doesn't make sense b/c we sucked last year. it was better last year)
2. "LSU was so physical we hurt UW and they didn't physically recover" (this is more from 2006)
we routinely do this and pump up teams we should have beaten by more
we have 2 excuses
1. the title of this thread (which doesn't make sense b/c we sucked last year. it was better last year)
2. "LSU was so physical we hurt UW and they didn't physically recover" (this is more from 2006)
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:13 pm to Udub22
I am not hoping for a drop-off, neither do I want one. It is VERY difficult to play with that much emotion every week. If they do, you have some VERY GOOD coaches.
ETA: Of course UW did not win on emotion alone. Execution is what made LSU look a little stunned/shocked/silly in the 1st half.
ETA: Of course UW did not win on emotion alone. Execution is what made LSU look a little stunned/shocked/silly in the 1st half.
This post was edited on 9/6/09 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:14 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
No, when they beat Norte Dame in October it will be
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:14 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
It is VERY difficult to play with that much emotion every week
espeically when LSU is SO PHYSICAL we just KILL THEIR MORALE for the year
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:14 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
you are out of your mind if you believe that. That team will play well and will be fired up all year with those 2 coaches. You obviously don't know about their hatred for WSU and Oregon - let alone SC.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
. "LSU was so physical their program went into a tailspin and hasn't recovered since"
This is actually more like it.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:15 pm to Jaketigger
quote:
ou obviously don't know about their hatred for WSU and Oregon - let alone SC.
exactly
in conference rivalries mean a LOT more than OOC rent a losses
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
If you think that team and stadium will be MORE JACKED to play a game than they were last night, then we did not watch the same game.
0-12 years and new Coaches (with talent) against a ranked oponent in the 1st game tend to do that for you. They have been wanting LSU all summer. We have been wanting to climb the space needle.
0-12 years and new Coaches (with talent) against a ranked oponent in the 1st game tend to do that for you. They have been wanting LSU all summer. We have been wanting to climb the space needle.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:28 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
9/05 LSU L
9/12 Idaho W
9/19 USC L
9/26 @ Stanford W
10/03 @ Notre Dame L
10/10 Arizona W
10/17 @ Arizona State W
10/24 Oregon L
11/07 @ UCLA W
11/14 @ Oregon State W
11/28 Washington State W
12/05 California L
7-6...in a bowl
9/12 Idaho W
9/19 USC L
9/26 @ Stanford W
10/03 @ Notre Dame L
10/10 Arizona W
10/17 @ Arizona State W
10/24 Oregon L
11/07 @ UCLA W
11/14 @ Oregon State W
11/28 Washington State W
12/05 California L
7-6...in a bowl
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:29 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
So they only got jacked up on 3rd down? That game had dick to do with Washington being hyped up and everything to do with 3rd down and Chavis.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:32 pm to JJ27
What do you mean? According to Coach Leslie they're going to the Rose Bowl this year....
What a crock!
What a crock!
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:32 pm to tigerfan5803
I believe 8-5 with a win over oregon, ND or Cal. Those coaches know all of those teams extremely well. This is assuming Locker stays healthy
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:35 pm to JJ27
quote:
JJ27
Third and chavis reaered it's ugly head for sure. It was NOT our only problem.
Their Defense was jacked. Locker AND Polk looked very good. Some of this is attributable to emotion, some to lack of preparation on our part.
quote:
That game had dick to do with Washington being hyped up and everything to do with 3rd down and Chavis
bullshite.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm not, but don't take last night as some great sign
I don't recall anyone saying it was a "great" anything, but it was a 1st game road win over a PAC 10 team.
Perhaps nothing to shout bout, but nothing to whine over either. imo
Popular
Back to top


6






