- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BCS works __% of the time? 27%
Posted on 7/16/09 at 11:41 am to tiger in the gump
Posted on 7/16/09 at 11:41 am to tiger in the gump
quote:
For the seasons of 2 undefeated I won't credit the BCS evaluation process, anybody could've picked the two contenders in '99 & '05.
Right, which is why we need an objective system to determine those teams in the other years. All those other years people can argue either way, but we have devised a system that combines a subjective component (the human polls) with objective computers to determine those two teams.
If you stop and look at the history of the BCS you will see that in almost every case you can say "yes, those two teams had the best combination of record and Schedule Strength of the field and were the most deserving". Find me 2 cases where you couldn't make that statement
Posted on 7/16/09 at 12:07 pm to lsumatt
quote:
Right, which is why we need an objective system to determine those teams in the other years. All those other years people can argue either way, but we have devised a system that combines a subjective component (the human polls) with objective computers to determine those two teams.
If you stop and look at the history of the BCS you will see that in almost every case you can say "yes, those two teams had the best combination of record and Schedule Strength of the field and were the most deserving". Find me 2 cases where you couldn't make that statement
I can come up with two cases, but the difficulty is that it considers factors that are not considered by the BCS.
Nebraska 2001 and Oklahoma 2003 do not meet the third of your criteria - "and were most deserving". But the reason is that they did not perform in a game that counts more than other games. Oklahoma lost only one game that year. The world recognized that the game they lost had extra weight - it was for a conference championship, and it was the last game of the season. However, the BCS is not allowed to give extra credence to any games, nor is it allowed to consider margin of victory or margin of defeat, so that game was just treated as another loss in their schedule.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News