Started By
Message

re: BCS works __% of the time? 27%

Posted on 7/16/09 at 10:50 am to
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 7/16/09 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Looking at history, it probably did. Historically, a team that starts out ahead of another team doesn't fall behind another team until it loses. That doesn't mean that Auburn was shafted, necessarily in 2004, but Auburn could not have jumped either USC or OU under almost any set of circumstances, and there is little historical precedent to show otherwise.
I can't believe people on LSU boards actually post this.

2007. USC #1, LSU #2.

USC beats Washington by 3.
LSU beats Tulane by 25.

LSU jumps USC in the AP poll.
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 7/16/09 at 10:58 am to
quote:

I can't believe people on LSU boards actually post this.


C'mon Adam. Its true that its hard as hell to pass an undefeated team in the top 5 to drop after about week 3. LSU did pass USC, but it was still early in the season and USC looked weak for a couple weeks in a row. Also, LSU already had some votes above USC for leverage.

Auburn didn't deserve it in 2004. But there was nothing they could have done starting from #13 to pass OU/USC as long as those teams looked okay while winning.
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7638 posts
Posted on 7/16/09 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

quote:


Looking at history, it probably did. Historically, a team that starts out ahead of another team doesn't fall behind another team until it loses. That doesn't mean that Auburn was shafted, necessarily in 2004, but Auburn could not have jumped either USC or OU under almost any set of circumstances, and there is little historical precedent to show otherwise.


I can't believe people on LSU boards actually post this.

2007. USC #1, LSU #2.

USC beats Washington by 3.
LSU beats Tulane by 25.

LSU jumps USC in the AP poll.


Did you read the whole comment? I specifically said the 2007 was an atypical year specifically because there was only one team with one or no losses. I also said that 2007 was the 1st year I remember that the AP voters did not move teams up and down in lock step.

I would hope that 2007 represents a watershed in breaking the tradition, but the fact is 2007 is an exception to the historical treatment of teams by the voters. Can you provide examples, other than an extremely rare exception in 2007, which I specifically pointed out as being exceptional (reinforcing the observation that there is little historical precedent, to say that pollsters don't move teams in lock step reflexively.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram