- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Matt Flynn
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:41 pm
I was at work today and got wind that he might have been released. I am sorry if this is old news but I have had limited access to media forums. Any truth or substance to this?
Once again, SIAP
Once again, SIAP
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:43 pm to JackBauer
No way. He is second string.
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:48 pm to JackBauer
seems like you're in the heart of Packer country
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:49 pm to JackBauer
Call me crazy but wouldn't that be a very stupid move to get rid of your #2 QB who has a smaller contract than your #3 QB?
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:50 pm to JackBauer
quote:
Any truth or substance to this?
In approximately 4 minutes of research, I have discovered that there is no mention of Flynn on the Green Bay Packers official website - Transactions Page.
Also, according to the Transcript for Coach McCarthy's June 10 presser, Flynn is still ahead of Brohm on the depth chart.
FWIW - JackBauer is a terrible screen name for somebody with no investigative skills.
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:52 pm to thunderbird1100
This
is exactly why they could get rid of him, more money invested in #3 means he gets first shot.
Then again I dont think they release him as much as switching their roles.
quote:
your #2 QB who has a smaller contract than your #3 QB?
is exactly why they could get rid of him, more money invested in #3 means he gets first shot.
Then again I dont think they release him as much as switching their roles.
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:54 pm to yurintroubl
quote:
JackBauer is a terrible screen name for somebody with no investigative skills.
post of the year!!!!
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:56 pm to tduecen
quote:
is exactly why they could get rid of him, more money invested in #3 means he gets first shot.
So that's why he's #3 and not #2?
It means they'd be dumping LESS money dropping the #2.
Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:58 pm to yurintroubl
quote:
FWIW - JackBauer is a terrible screen name for somebody with no investigative skills
+1

Posted on 6/17/09 at 8:58 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
FWIW - JackBauer is a terrible screen name for somebody with no investigative skills.



Posted on 6/17/09 at 9:00 pm to BAMBAM
quote:
BAMBAM
Quick hijack.... I finished your sig w/background, but the thread was deleted for some reason. Check back here in a sec...
ETA:
This post was edited on 6/17/09 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 6/17/09 at 9:01 pm to tduecen
quote:
is exactly why they could get rid of him, more money invested in #3 means he gets first shot.
He got first shot. Did you see Brohm run the team in preseason last year? Aparently not.
Maybe Brohm will learn the offense when practice begins and pass Flynn, but Brohm didn't play like a second round pick last pre season.
Popular
Back to top
