- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Please convince me this is not Tepper's drop linebacker def.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:27 am
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:27 am
See attached article from The Advocate. Linebacker changes sound alot like Lou Tepper's awful failure know as the "drop linebacker". Please convince me I am wrong.
LINK
LINK
6
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:29 am to BIG MAC
quote:
Linebacker changes sound alot like Lou Tepper's awful failure know as the "drop linebacker".
but his name is john chavis, so it's different
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:34 am to TheDoc
quote:
but his name is john chavis, so it's different
Doc, don't be stupid on this too. All schemes drop LBs into zone coverage sometimes. A lot even drop DEs too. And one of Tepper's problems was that he dropped big, slow, white LBs.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:41 am to Hot Carl
Chavis is proven. He was one of the top DC's in the sec the last 10 years.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:45 am to Hot Carl
"Doc, don't be stupid on this too. All schemes drop LBs into zone coverage SOMETIMES."
My concern is that your linebacker is alwaysyour nickle back>. Do we have an athlete who can play both well. If not the defense will either suffer at linebacker or nickleback.
My concern is that your linebacker is alwaysyour nickle back>. Do we have an athlete who can play both well. If not the defense will either suffer at linebacker or nickleback.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:49 am to BIG MAC
Big Mac, I think all schemes have some merit or people would not run them....having said that I believe that its all about the talent, speed, intellegence of those athletes in the scheme that primarily make any one particular scheme work. ie. not many schools could run Florida's offensive scheme with success because they can't recruit the type of athlete Florida can.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:52 am to BIG MAC
3 LBs against a spread could work if we had fast/athletic LBs...we don't really
Posted on 3/16/09 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
I don't need to convince you.........look at the product.........unless John Chavis has a magic fricking wand that turns avg LB's into monster LB's how in the hell did his "drop linebacker" D rank in the top 5 for 15 freaking years?
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:08 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
how in the hell did his "drop linebacker" D rank in the top 5 for 15 freaking years?
well it hasn't ranked in the top 49 Ds 2 of the past 3 years, so....
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
well it hasn't ranked in the top 49 Ds 2 of the past 3 years, so....
Yeah lets throw out the most RECENT sucess to prove a point or forget about the other 15 years.......the man has coached for 20 years.
If he gives LSU another 20 like UT got, we'll have made one of the best hires ever.
This post was edited on 3/16/09 at 8:14 am
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:15 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
Doc, don't be stupid on this too. All schemes drop LBs into zone coverage sometimes. A lot even drop DEs too. And one of Tepper's problems was that he dropped big, slow, white LBs.
Terrance O'Bryant wasn't big, he wasn't white, and he wasn't slow.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Material, youth, and injuries?
well it hasn't ranked in the top 49 Ds 2 of the past 3 years, so....
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:18 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Material, youth, and injuries?
You can't talk reality with SFP.........he is a numbers guy........
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:20 am to NC_Tigah
i'm just saying it hasn't bee "top 5 for the past 15 years" and to suggest it has is an outright lie
and since this is about LBs, material at LB is a worry to me in the immediate future
and since this is about LBs, material at LB is a worry to me in the immediate future
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:20 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
You can't talk reality with SFP.........he is a numbers guy........
and you posted very incorrect numbers that i corrected
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
3 LBs against a spread could work if we had fast/athletic LBs...we don't really
+1
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm just saying it hasn't bee "top 5 for the past 15 years" and to suggest it has is an outright lie
You incompetent mother fricker.........I didn't say the PAST 15 years...........I said for 15 years......
15 of the 20 years the man coached it was top 5......75% of the time it works everytime #'s man.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:23 am to L S Usetheforce
quote:
and you posted very incorrect numbers that i corrected
No you just can't read and interpret information.
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:25 am to L S Usetheforce
read what you said again
quote:
how in the hell did his "drop linebacker" D rank in the top 5 for 15 freaking years?
Posted on 3/16/09 at 8:26 am to SlowFlowPro
I did.......tell me how you interpret 15 years and conclude that it is consecutively?
Unless I'm missing something counselor?
Unless I'm missing something counselor?
This post was edited on 3/16/09 at 8:29 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News