- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is Joe Kent’s Resignation Part of a Broader “CIA/Deep State” Plot to Undermine Trump?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:41 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:41 am
quote:
Something doesn’t add up, and I’m not buying the official story.
Today on Stinchfield, I dig into the sudden shift from Joe Kent, a man who once sounded the alarm on Iran, now suddenly backing away and denouncing the very conflict he previously warned about. What changed? And more importantly, who got to him?
Then there’s the eyebrow-raising appearance on Shawn Ryan’s show, a platform with well-documented ties to intelligence circles. Coincidence or coordination?
Because when you connect the dots, a chilling possibility emerges: Was Kent positioned as part of a broader effort by the intelligence community to manipulate the narrative and ultimately undermine Donald Trump?
What if bad intel was deliberately fed into the system, designed to drag Trump into a geopolitical trap? A war meant to make him look reckless, outmatched, and dangerous on the world stage.
But here’s the twist they didn’t see coming: Trump did not fail. His leadership, and the strength of the United States military, flipped the script. So now what?
A sudden reversal. A resignation. A retreat from the narrative. Was Joe Kent’s exit a clean-up operation? A desperate attempt to salvage a plot that did not go as planned? This is about more than one man. This is about the machinery behind the scenes—and whether the so-called deep state just got caught overplaying its hand.
https://grantstinchfield.com/episode/is-joe-kents-resignation-part-of-a-broader-cia-deep-state-plot-to-undermine-president-trump
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:43 am to loogaroo
Not everything is a conspiracy.
Sometimes people are just dirty, or become compromised over time.
Sometimes people are just dirty, or become compromised over time.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:44 am to loogaroo
As former CIA agent Mike Baker said on Gutfeld, the CIA is thrilled with the Trump Administration now.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:48 am to loogaroo
quote:
Was Kent positioned as part of a broader effort by the intelligence community to manipulate the narrative and ultimately undermine Donald Trump?
Whether the intent was there to undermine the President, the end result is the same, undermining the President.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:48 am to loogaroo
As a former spook, it's not a bad theory.
I think another may be that Tulsi is pretty fed up, so having Joe leave is kind of her warning shot. She is playing good little trooper, while he can blast away on the outside.
I think another may be that Tulsi is pretty fed up, so having Joe leave is kind of her warning shot. She is playing good little trooper, while he can blast away on the outside.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:49 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
As former CIA agent Mike Baker said on Gutfeld, the CIA is thrilled with the Trump Administration now.
Yeah war with Iran is a huge Deep State/Globalist/CIA policy. This is their dream scenario
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:49 am to loogaroo
To me, it seems like an opportune moment for him to get in front of his criminal probe.
He was allegedly leaking for a while and the Trump admin suspected him, keeping him out of meetings.
If he speaks against Trump and is later prosecuted, he’ll cry political retribution.
If you listened to this guy speak when he was in Congress, he sounded like an Israel firster, as the Panicans would describe someone.
He was allegedly leaking for a while and the Trump admin suspected him, keeping him out of meetings.
If he speaks against Trump and is later prosecuted, he’ll cry political retribution.
If you listened to this guy speak when he was in Congress, he sounded like an Israel firster, as the Panicans would describe someone.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:51 am to loogaroo
There is nothing to back this up in terms of real evidence...
but just my thought of which I am entertaining...
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump made a deal with the CIA for permanent protection and immunity.
That's my conspiracy theory that I ponder.
but just my thought of which I am entertaining...
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump made a deal with the CIA for permanent protection and immunity.
That's my conspiracy theory that I ponder.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:52 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump made a deal with the CIA for permanent protection and immunity.
Do you have any reason for such a theory? Anything to support such a bold claim.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:54 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
As former CIA agent Mike Baker said on Gutfeld, the CIA is thrilled with the Trump Administration now.
I thought this was the whole point of electing Trump. Proven Warrior, Nothing can stop what is coming, get in pussy, we’re making America great again, Trump can’t be bought, etc etc etc.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:54 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
There is nothing to back this up in terms of real evidence...
but just my thought of which I am entertaining...
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump made a deal with the CIA for permanent protection and immunity.
That's my conspiracy theory that I ponder.
You can expand it a bit and still make sense
Israel promoted Zelensky to oust the Western/CIA puppet installed in 2014 so that they could ensure Russian invasion, which they wanted to leave Iran helpless. This allowed the path for war with Iran finally.
Trump still supports Ukraine as part of some version of the deal you referenced, which also is why he did the 180 on intervention and joined the neocons.
You could take it one step further and think that's how Rubio got such a big job, to be groomed to continue the neocon policies after Trump leaves.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:55 am to Deuces
quote:
To me, it seems like an opportune moment for him to get in front of his criminal probe.
How do we know, FBI didn't have that smear ready to go for anyone who got out of line? DOJ smeared Gaetz for years, then never brought anything.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:56 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
How do we know, FBI didn't have that smear ready to go for anyone who got out of line? DOJ smeared Gaetz for years, then never brought anything.
Because they most likely have documentation that goes back months or even years.
Why was the Trump admin keeping him out of meetings?
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 7:58 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:56 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
How do we know, FBI didn't have that smear ready to go for anyone who got out of line?
That’s how they operate
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:58 am to LuckyTiger
So if they said it on Gutfeld it’s gotta be true. The CIA definitely puts out their honest feelings / intentions out for consumption on cable news shows. Haha. Good sheep!
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 7:59 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump still supports Ukraine as part of some version of the deal you referenced, which also is why he did the 180 on intervention and joined the neocons.
You could take it one step further and think that's how Rubio got such a big job, to be groomed to continue the neocon policies after Trump leaves.
In hindsight, it certainly looks like he decided to make deals with big money to win and insulate himself from attack. He was extremely close with Miriam on the campaign trail.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:01 am to Deuces
Well, I think the CIA and deeply established organizations closely tied to the government, the ones that people go to when they're not in the administration and return from when they are in the administration, essentially or largely control and run this country or at the very least influence it to an extremely powerful degree, probably more than any other influence.
This, along with the realities that Trump's life and freedom and long term viability have been gravely threatened, added with essentially 180 reversals on key issues, especially those issues relative to foreign policy and security, lead the to consider the possibility. If I wanted Liz Cheney or John Brennan or John Bolton I would have voted for them, not Trump.
As I've said, it's a conspiracy theory and not one of which I am a committed believer. But I do wonder about such.
This, along with the realities that Trump's life and freedom and long term viability have been gravely threatened, added with essentially 180 reversals on key issues, especially those issues relative to foreign policy and security, lead the to consider the possibility. If I wanted Liz Cheney or John Brennan or John Bolton I would have voted for them, not Trump.
As I've said, it's a conspiracy theory and not one of which I am a committed believer. But I do wonder about such.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:03 am to Bunk Moreland
I don't think the CIA could protect Trump like that, in all honesty.
As long as Trump avoids engaging in behavior like post 2020 election he'll be fine. That stupidity is what gave so much ammo for his opponents.
As long as Trump avoids engaging in behavior like post 2020 election he'll be fine. That stupidity is what gave so much ammo for his opponents.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:08 am to loogaroo
There is definitely some dirty tactics. It is beyond unbecoming for Joe Kent to go on Tucker.
Muchless insinuating on a public venue that Charlie Kirk was killed because he was against the war, and insinuating further Israel killed him.
Before CK was assassinated no one was foreseeing any wars with Iran. Circumstances change.
I am listening to Tulsi live as I type this. Her intel report for public consumption...leaves my mind with zero doubt Ptesident Trump acted properly and accordingly. And Israel is not calling the shots over POTUS.
Any other talk is Tucker/Candace click bait. Joe Kent saying he saw online this or that regarding Israel and Kirk. HOURS after him resigning his post, should have him recalled to AD and a court-martial.
Muchless insinuating on a public venue that Charlie Kirk was killed because he was against the war, and insinuating further Israel killed him.
Before CK was assassinated no one was foreseeing any wars with Iran. Circumstances change.
I am listening to Tulsi live as I type this. Her intel report for public consumption...leaves my mind with zero doubt Ptesident Trump acted properly and accordingly. And Israel is not calling the shots over POTUS.
Any other talk is Tucker/Candace click bait. Joe Kent saying he saw online this or that regarding Israel and Kirk. HOURS after him resigning his post, should have him recalled to AD and a court-martial.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:09 am to cajunangelle
quote:
I am listening to Tulsi live as I type this. Her intel report for public consumption...leaves my mind with zero doubt Ptesident Trump acted properly and accordingly. And Israel is not calling the shots over POTUS.
I watched that as well and agree.
Kash speaking now.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 8:10 am
Popular
Back to top


7







