Started By
Message

Is WBB about to fall off?

Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:55 am
Posted by Tigernomics
Member since Jan 2024
970 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:55 am
Big 4 gone after this year
Top Assistant and glue for a lot of the players Gary R leaving to go be a HC and taking a bunch of assistants with him?

What’s the thought on how we will look next year and beyond?
Posted by LSUfan2008
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
2708 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:56 am to
Kim has lost great players and assistants before. She is who she is and we will sustain a high quality program.
Posted by Bill W Tiger
LSU Alumnus
Member since May 2008
1875 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:57 am to
Big 4? Who Dat?
Posted by TigahFan85
Member since Feb 2024
878 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:58 am to
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21883 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:58 am to
I think it has more to do with Mulkey more than anything. Fargas's last year, LSU finished 8th in the league...Mulkey's first year LSU is 2nd in the SEC and goes to the second round. So with Mulkey in charge I'm not as concerned.
Posted by Dlab2013
Pineville, Luzianna
Member since Jun 2013
9484 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:59 am to
Literally Redus and 1 other asst are leaving….. it’s a natural collegiate coaching cycle
Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
18299 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Is WBB about to fall off?


No Mulkey is still the coach
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65093 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:03 am to
Gary Redus was always posting to social media how much he and Angel Reese were working on her post moves and shots around the goal.

That's a big "F" grade if you ask me. Apparently he never instructed her to shoot the basketball above her head and not just flip it up to the goal from her waist and hope it bangs in.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
72056 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:06 am to
I think the more interesting question is with the WNBA about to approve massive pay increases where players can start making more like half a mil a year up to a million per year; do we start to see more early declarations for the WNBA as a result? Previously it just didnt make much sense with no money really there and NIL able to probably pay as much or even more in some cases.
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
69903 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:07 am to
Oh ffs

Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
69903 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:09 am to
I don’t think that’ll last long considering how much money the organization loses and the nba can’t keep increasing the subsidies
This post was edited on 3/18/26 at 9:40 am
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
72056 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

I don’t think that’ll last long considering how much money the organization loses and the nbs can’t keep increasing the subsidies



They seem to be basing this off a massive new TV contract where its like $2.2B over next 11 years or about $200M/yr just from tv money. Right now they make $50-$60M/yr from tv by comparison.

Recent WNBA losses were like $40M/yr.

So in theory, the NBA shouldnt even have to subsidize the league at all any more.
This post was edited on 3/18/26 at 8:14 am
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12756 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:23 am to
quote:


That's a big "F" grade if you ask me. Apparently he never instructed her to shoot the basketball above her head and not just flip it up to the goal from her waist and hope it bangs in


Angel would have probably been a 2 time All American and high draft choice with better coaching.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
20041 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

I think the more interesting question is with the WNBA about to approve massive pay increases where players can start making more like half a mil a year up to a million per year; do we start to see more early declarations for the WNBA as a result?
if that's true, it's only because the huge subsidies the NBA pays to keep the WNBA alive will get much, much larger.

Let the WNBA (and any other organization) live or die on its own merit.
Posted by LSUGrad9295
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2007
37573 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Gary R leaving to go be a HC and taking a bunch of assistants with him?


When did ONE become a "bunch"?
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65093 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Angel would have probably been a 2 time All American and high draft choice with better coaching.


She was 2 time All American because she was bigger and more athletic than most college players. She was able to get offensive rebounds and putbacks.

If she was a more skilled shooter around the goal she wouldn't be routinely mocked on social media. She literally flips the ball up from shoulder height and just hopes the ball richochets off the backboard into the goal.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
38541 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:49 am to
Nobody denies she has a problem getting the ball in the basket. Coaches love a rebounding machine and ball hog under the rim though
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
79920 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

She was 2 time All American because she was bigger and more athletic than most college players.

She's a two time allstar in the pros.
quote:


If she was a more skilled shooter around the goal she wouldn't be routinely mocked on social media

She's mocked on social media because she taunted Clark and it pissed off some white people. Also it's easy engagement bait.
This post was edited on 3/18/26 at 8:51 am
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
130811 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:52 am to
quote:

They seem to be basing this off a massive new TV contract where its like $2.2B over next 11 years or about $200M/yr just from tv money. Right now they make $50-$60M/yr from tv by comparison. Recent WNBA losses were like $40M/yr. So in theory, the NBA shouldnt even have to subsidize the league at all any more.


That TV deal is an NBA subsidy.

The NBA forces it on networks to get their NBA rights
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
72056 posts
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:03 am to
quote:

That TV deal is an NBA subsidy.



It's a deal for both the NBA and WNBA; the WNBA just gets a much smaller allocated portion of it. The total deal is $76B over 11 years, or about $6.9B/yr.

The WNBA portion of it is only $2.2B, or $200M/yr.

The WNBA right now gets about $50M-60M from tv currently.

So this is where they are basing the increases off of and again, in theory the WNBA wont be in the red every year where the NBA has to send tens of millions to float it.
This post was edited on 3/18/26 at 9:04 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram