- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Myth Busted? 1959 Chevy Bel Air vs. 2009 Malibu Crash Test (controversies remain)
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:10 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:10 am
Many of us have seen this IIHS’s 50th anniversary crash test footage between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and 1959 Chevy Belair conducted in 2009. Author Greg Horn is still bothered by rumors that the test was tainted and that it "gave rise to conspiracy theories that continue to circulate online"; That there was the "persistent accusation that the Bel Air was somehow “manipulated” to make it crumple more easily."
More excerpts from Horn's article:
De-bunking a myth
quote:
The sight of the classic Bel Air, a car many believed was built to withstand crashes due to its strong frame and steel body panels, crumpling so easily when it collided with the modern, unibody Malibu shocked many. For some, this test demonstrated just how far vehicle safety has come, while others dismissed it as a staged stunt to promote the superiority of modern cars. One of the most persistent responses to the test has been the accusation that the Bel Air was somehow “manipulated” to make it crumple more easily.
These myths include:
* "The car might have looked mint on the outside, but all the orange dust thrown up during the crash suggests the chassis was quite rusty.
* "That’s a totally misleading test. Without an engine and transmission in it, of course, an empty shell would crumple. They probably cut the frame too, to sell us a feeling of false safety. What else are they manipulating?”
* “I read an article in a car magazine about this test. They claimed the ’59 had been ‘cut’ and weakened to dramatize the outcome.
While these comments show just how far the myths have spread, my inspection didn’t reveal any evidence supporting these theories. The car’s drivetrain remained intact, and the frame was solid and unaltered. The Bel Air simply did what many classic cars would do in a modern crash: it crumpled significantly, because its design wasn’t built to withstand the kinds of forces that modern vehicles are engineered to handle.
I have never seen these photos.
Impressions and thoughts?
The '59's entire driver's side front hood is and engine bay has been twisted and shoved over into the passenger side almost a full 45 degrees like a tin can. Was the engine also jammed into the passenger side?
I'd also have expected the engine to have intruded well into the center of the cabin.
Looks like a decapitation.
NOTE: ** There is an overhead shot missing from this IIHS footage **
Is it important omission? Maybe. Maybe not. I'll post it as well ( from Consumer Report at 1:30 )
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:12 am to EphesianArmor
This Consumer Reports video includes the missing overhead footage (1:30)
We don't get the full shot of the impact. It might have been helpful.
We don't get the full shot of the impact. It might have been helpful.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:17 am to EphesianArmor
What possible reason could they have for not including the full overhead shot?
This is how you get suspicion and conspiracy.
This is how you get suspicion and conspiracy.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:23 am to EphesianArmor
You can walk up to these cars in the IIHS office and video/photograph them. Plenty of videos online of people doing so.
Id imagine if the rust and cutting story had any legs there would be pictures of these areas to support.
Id imagine if the rust and cutting story had any legs there would be pictures of these areas to support.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:28 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
What possible reason could they have for not including the full overhead shot?
This is how you get suspicion and conspiracy.
Exactly.
Some believe that the full omission of the overhead shot might reveal some discrepancies in the collision that could possibly fuel reinforcement of the "conspiracy" claims.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:30 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Id imagine if the rust and cutting story had any legs there would be pictures of these areas to support.
Dunno about that.
quote:
You can walk up to these cars in the IIHS office and video/photograph them. Plenty of videos online of people doing so.
Sweet. Close ups?
I'd love to see pics of the engine bay (what's left of it.) And some shots from beneath the car as well.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 11:32 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:36 am to EphesianArmor
My suggestion? Don't be to quick to part with that 1959 Chevy Bel Air. Why? You might be happy you kept it if an enemy ever detonates one of them fancy Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse bombs, near your town.
Fry them modern electronic ignition cars fast.
Fry them modern electronic ignition cars fast.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 11:37 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:44 am to EphesianArmor
All I can say is that my mother and her entire family were in a 1957 Bel Air station wagon in 1963. They were on a two-lane road and another vehicle crossed over into their lane and hit them head on.
Everyone in the vehicle (grandma and grand dad, mom, and her three siblings) was injured to some degree. My mother had a broken jaw and arm. The engine was pushed through the firewall, more into the passenger's side and ended up in my grandmother's lap. She was stuck for a while, but survived. She would spend the next several months, close to 7 total, after a complication in the hospital. It required a full hip replacement and rods in one leg. She nearly died.
The person in the other vehicle was dead on the scene. They believe she could have had a heart attack and was dead prior to the collision.
Everyone in the vehicle (grandma and grand dad, mom, and her three siblings) was injured to some degree. My mother had a broken jaw and arm. The engine was pushed through the firewall, more into the passenger's side and ended up in my grandmother's lap. She was stuck for a while, but survived. She would spend the next several months, close to 7 total, after a complication in the hospital. It required a full hip replacement and rods in one leg. She nearly died.
The person in the other vehicle was dead on the scene. They believe she could have had a heart attack and was dead prior to the collision.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 11:47 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:45 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Sweet. Close ups?
Yep.
Bay may not open because it is crunched. Seems like you can see through the wheel well from the online videos.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 11:46 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 11:59 am to EphesianArmor
Not arguing that cars are safer today than cars of yesteryear, but a key point in this test should be addressed.
Part of this can be contributed to the 1959 Bel Air "X Frame" design. It was a known weakness that relied on the door sheetmetal and sill for some of its structural integrity. Hence, the twist of the front clip would have been an issue known beforehand.
If the test would have used a 1959 Buick LeSabre (shown) or the 55-57 Bel Air with its squared frame widley popular in its time, there may have been some differences with the test results.

quote:
The '59's entire driver's side front hood is and engine bay has been twisted and shoved over into the passenger side almost a full 45 degrees
Part of this can be contributed to the 1959 Bel Air "X Frame" design. It was a known weakness that relied on the door sheetmetal and sill for some of its structural integrity. Hence, the twist of the front clip would have been an issue known beforehand.
If the test would have used a 1959 Buick LeSabre (shown) or the 55-57 Bel Air with its squared frame widley popular in its time, there may have been some differences with the test results.

This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:09 pm to Traveler
This is a fascinating thread! Thanks to all of you.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:14 pm to Traveler
quote:
Part of this can be contributed to the 1959 Bel Air "X Frame" design. It was a known weakness that relied on the door sheetmetal and sill for some of its structural integrity. Hence, the twist of the front clip would have been an issue known beforehand.
What years did they use that design?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:20 pm to LegendInMyMind
If memory serves, it was used on the 59-63 years. The later years added some changes and strengthening to the design.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:27 pm to Traveler
Outstanding illustration and points.
quote:
Part of this can be contributed to the 1959 Bel Air "X Frame" design.
If the test would have used a 1959 Buick LeSabre (shown) or the 55-57 Bel Air with its squared frame widley popular in its time, there may have been some differences with the test results.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:29 pm to LegendInMyMind
I just called and talked to my mom. She said my grandmother wasn't pinned for long because my grandad thought the car was going to explode. No one knows how he got her out. Kids ranged from 12 to 5. My aunt, the five-year-old, was in my grandmother's lap. She had a badly broken leg and was in traction, shared a hospital room with my grandmother, and they both hated to see the doctor coming because that meant they were doing adjustments on the traction (they were both in) and it was terrible pain.
My mom and her brothers were in the back seat. The boys were thrown back into the cargo area and my mom, who had her legs up on the back of the driver's seat slammed her head into the seat, breaking her jaw and cutting her head.
The ER had basically given my grandmother up for dead and were not working on her. She was badly cut on her head and face, pelvis and hip broken, leg broken in the femur, right arm mangled. It took strong demands from a few good people/friends for them to start working to save her. They told her she wouldn't walk again and would never use her right arm. She said, "You're crazy, I have four kids to raise......I have to walk." She could write her name with her right hand by the time she left the hospital, and was sure to show the doctor. She would walk on her own again, too, though her stubbornness led to her falling and going right back to the hospital for another three months (right at 7 total).
She would go on to have another late in life baby, their fifth, and she worked past the age of 70. She was always slow, the hip replacement actually came several years after the wreck, I was wrong on that in the first post, but she got around. She raised her kids and helped raise a bunch of us grandkids.
ETA: Mom didn't remember the exact year of the Bel Air wagon, just that it was "late 50s". The damage from their wreck looked like the OP, but worse. Maybe it wasn't a '57 like I said.
My mom and her brothers were in the back seat. The boys were thrown back into the cargo area and my mom, who had her legs up on the back of the driver's seat slammed her head into the seat, breaking her jaw and cutting her head.
The ER had basically given my grandmother up for dead and were not working on her. She was badly cut on her head and face, pelvis and hip broken, leg broken in the femur, right arm mangled. It took strong demands from a few good people/friends for them to start working to save her. They told her she wouldn't walk again and would never use her right arm. She said, "You're crazy, I have four kids to raise......I have to walk." She could write her name with her right hand by the time she left the hospital, and was sure to show the doctor. She would walk on her own again, too, though her stubbornness led to her falling and going right back to the hospital for another three months (right at 7 total).
She would go on to have another late in life baby, their fifth, and she worked past the age of 70. She was always slow, the hip replacement actually came several years after the wreck, I was wrong on that in the first post, but she got around. She raised her kids and helped raise a bunch of us grandkids.
ETA: Mom didn't remember the exact year of the Bel Air wagon, just that it was "late 50s". The damage from their wreck looked like the OP, but worse. Maybe it wasn't a '57 like I said.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:36 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
All I can say is that my mother and her entire family were in a 1957 Bel Air station wagon in 1963. They were on a two-lane road and another vehicle crossed over into their lane and hit them head on....
Wow. That is an amazing account. Terrible accident, hurt and injuried but thankfully all did survive.
From what we can gather from 'Traveler's' post and illustration, survivability odds were greatly increased with the1957 Chevy's much better Square frame vs the "newer" 1959 X-Frame.
You wonder -- was it just a Chevy division cost-cutting measure? (Buick LeSabre frame remained Square.)
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:40 pm to LegendInMyMind
WHOA!
Thanks for those details. It is mind-boggling that you mom still remembered such minute details and what was a actually a dire situation.
Gramma was a real tough cookie. They don't make 'em like her anymore.
Thanks for those details. It is mind-boggling that you mom still remembered such minute details and what was a actually a dire situation.
Gramma was a real tough cookie. They don't make 'em like her anymore.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:47 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
From what we can gather from 'Traveler's' post and illustration, survivability odds were greatly increased with the1957 Chevy's much better Square frame vs the "newer" 1959 X-Frame.
Yeah, I'm almost certain now that it was pre-1959. That says something, though, that the "safer" design still had its issues. That can be said about a lot of cars from that era. We aren't even talking about a high speed crash either, this was on a two-lane road and the driver of the other vehicle was an older lady. Speed wasn't a big factor.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:50 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Thanks for those details. It is mind-boggling that you mom still remembered such minute details and what was a actually a dire situation.
Hell, mom said, "I was 9......I don't remember all that much."
Then, she goes on to tell all of that.
In a box or album somewhere we have a couple of old newspaper clippings about the wreck. One shows the vehicle.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:55 pm to LegendInMyMind
My Dad was hit broadside on the driver's door on his '55 Bel Air. The impact broke his leg, but I believe he would have told you if this would have happened with his 59 Bel Air, the results probably would have had a different ending. He did like the 59 for its extra room though.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 12:57 pm
Popular
Back to top

7




