- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why we need term limits
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:46 pm to March1st
We at the very least need age limits. We should also require cognitive test to politicians over 60 or 65 to avoid any more Joe Biden situations.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:48 pm to RollingwiththeTide
If POTUS is limited to two terms, so should be our Reps. It's that simple.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:48 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:why not just do it at any age?
We should also require cognitive test to politicians over 60 or 65
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:50 pm to AlterEd
Well some would argue that we already have term limits because we can just simply vote out any politician we think may be to old every 2-4-years. I would like to see it actually put into law though.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:50 pm to Kafka
As a prerequisite for taking office. With a frickin IQ standard established.
And I'm not saying they all have to be scholars, but let's say 100. After all, that is the average. You cannot convince me that Hank Johnson has an IQ of 100.
And I'm not saying they all have to be scholars, but let's say 100. After all, that is the average. You cannot convince me that Hank Johnson has an IQ of 100.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:51 pm to Kafka
Hey no argument from me. That’s even better.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:51 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
Well some would argue that we already have term limits because we can just simply vote out any politician we think may be to old every 2-4-years. I
And I would argue that those people are ineligible to hold office for being too stupid. Like Hank Johnson.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:54 pm to AlterEd
ohhhhhhhhhh no you diiiiiiiiid'n!

Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:57 pm to March1st
We need better voters and candidates.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:57 pm to FLTech
We cannot have career retards running our government. Career Retards is what leads to 37 trillion in debt and Jeffery Epstein.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:58 pm to AlterEd
I have always looked at term limits like most of society looks at the id to vote issue. There is no logical reason to object to it.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 10:58 pm to AlterEd
quote:
If POTUS is limited to two terms, so should be our Reps. It's that simple.
Not to mention in the senate they get 6 year terms
I'd be good with allowing house reps more than 2 terms since they serve 2 year terms. But we could cap it at 4 to 6 terms giving them a max service of 8-12 years.
And we either need to have an upper age limit or rigorous competency testing (honestly we should have competency testing for people of all ages)
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:01 pm to Powerman
2 terms in the Senate and 6 in the house is acceptable. But that would mean POTUS can serve 3 terms, not 2.
They're either co-equal branches or they're not.
They're either co-equal branches or they're not.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:07 pm to FLTech
This moron should have been thrown out of office after he made that stupid comment about Guam tipping over.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:09 pm to RollingwiththeTide
He would have likely needed an intelligence waiver to join the Army. And their cutoff is the actual "retard" line.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:11 pm to AlterEd
I do not think even AOC or Crockett would say something that stupid. That’s saying something considering all the air in their heads could give Mars a breathable atmosphere.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:12 pm to AlterEd
quote:
2 terms in the Senate and 6 in the house is acceptable. But that would mean POTUS can serve 3 terms, not 2.
They're either co-equal branches or they're not.
I don't think that the time served needs to be equal for each group
But I do think that a max of 12 would be a good starting point
I don't like the idea of 3 terms for a president because they have significantly more power than one person in either the house or senate
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:13 pm to RollingwiththeTide
Both of those women are much more intelligent than he is. And they're still both very stupid.
It's like an exponential curve. AOC is stupid. Johnson is retarded. And the difference in intellect is vast.
It's like an exponential curve. AOC is stupid. Johnson is retarded. And the difference in intellect is vast.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:15 pm to Powerman
quote:
I don't like the idea of 3 terms for a president because they have significantly more power than one person in either the house or senate
But none of them have been elected by the overall majority of the country.
Popular
Back to top

8






