Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Refusing to let laws be enforced peacefully is just terrorism

Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:48 pm
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4837 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 9:48 pm
Passing laws is very difficult. You have to win a lot of elections in a lot of places. You have to go through a very long and tedious legislative process, with lots of compromises and debate.

You have to survive potential court challenges.

The entire process takes years, many millions of dollars, and for national laws hundreds of millions of people across thousands of elections.

If a few thousand people rioting can get a law thrown out they don't like, you essentially have complete anarchy. Every law is just subject to a few idiots rioting.

There are plenty of laws I don't like myself. If they get to ignore laws they don't like, so should we.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81102 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

There are plenty of laws I don't like myself. If they get to ignore laws they don't like, so should we.


Start with the tax code.
Posted by UncleLogger
Freetown
Member since Jan 2008
3188 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:25 pm to
Depends on the law.

quote:

There are plenty of laws I don't like myself. If they get to ignore laws they don't like, so should we.


I can’t imagine too many scenarios where my best course of action is to take to the streets and fight it out with the government. Serious shite would have to pop off. These dipshits risking jail or whatever rioting about immigration enforcement never had anything to lose in the first place. Not really the same thing.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18355 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:36 pm to
100% domestic terrorism. Any time you see a city suspend the rule of law in certain areas in order to let the people they agree with terrorize the city.. it's city endorsed domestic terrorism.


Idk why the suspension of state/city laws isn't talked about more.

Seattle in Chaz, three people died because the suspension of laws there allowed a violent mob to take over part of the city and kick out all first responders.

In Portland, a guy was executed because the suspension of laws allowed mob rule in the streets.

In kenosha, due to the suspension of laws, a large mob was allowed to rule that city.... and was allowed to chase down and try to murder the then 17 year old rittenhouse, forcing him into a life and death situation.

In Minneapolis multiple people have died due to the suspension of laws. In 2020 they found a corpse in the basement of one of the buildings that was allowed to be burned down. In 2025/26. They allow mob rule again, which led to the prolonged confrontation between federal law enforcement and crazy people who want to fight federal law enforcement. Which led to injured fed enforcement and dead crazy people.

There are countless more that I can't remember exact locations. Like a mob stopped a car and one of the people in the mob shot and killed the driver. People have been forced to defend themselves, also leading to deaths, like that bar owner who was placed in a chokehold and after multiple warnings , had to shoot the a-hole, ending up killing the guy. Shooter eventually killled himself due to whatever state it was, charging him with first degree murder and him knowing he'll probably be railroaded. (Can remember the incidents of these but not the cities). All of it was because the suspension of laws allowed mob rule.
Posted by Tigers0918
Member since Feb 2020
1822 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:59 pm to


This is Republicans self admitting what they are
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram