- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Didn't fed judges refuse to prosecute Comey, fanni and Leticia?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:19 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:19 am
What's the point in bondi bringing charges when the entire federal judicial system is going to just going to let them go anyway?
They are only interested when it's Trump.
They are only interested when it's Trump.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:22 am to CAD703X
A Minnesota grand jury is worrisome.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:23 am to CAD703X
quote:
What's the point in bondi bringing charges when the entire federal judicial system is going to just going to let them go anyway?
They are only interested when it's Trump.
I'm not sure if you know this, but in Trump's 2 federal cases, at the time of his election, one was dismissed (due to inappropriately-appointed prosecutor, like with Comey, et al) and one was gutted with an immunity ruling. So the federal court was very favorable to Trump during his prosecutions.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:24 am to SlowFlowPro
ACAHUAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLYYY
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:27 am to CAD703X
You can cope about your point being nuked but it doesn't change what you said or the quality of the argument presented.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:sfp: THE WERE RIGHT TO CONVICT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND LET THOSE INNOCENT DEMOCRATS GO.
can cope about your point being nuked but it doesn't change what you said or the quality of the argument presented.
THERE WAS NO LAWFARE
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:34 am to CAD703X
quote:
sfp: THE WERE RIGHT TO CONVICT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND LET THOSE INNOCENT DEMOCRATS GO.
THERE WAS NO LAWFARE
What in the...frick?
You're flailing
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:37 am to CAD703X
quote:
What's the point in bondi bringing charges when the entire federal judicial system is going to just going to let them go anyway?
Wait. Are you saying that it looks like the black robe firewall would completely derail any/all arrests and indictments against our usual suspects as it stands, right now?
What a cogent conclusion.
It would almost appear as if the 47 administration is waiting on circumstances to change with respect to the lawfare battlefield before they make their moves....
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:37 am to SlowFlowPro
Define lawfare. Are you still blowing Jack Smith and swallowing?
Karla will be along to dress you down, will he call you boy?
Karla will be along to dress you down, will he call you boy?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:39 am to SlowFlowPro
I remember when you claimed one of those bougus charges would for sure stick
You were so giddy cause of TDS
You were so giddy cause of TDS
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:40 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Wait. Are you saying that it looks like the black robe firewall would completely derail any/all arrests and indictments against our usual suspects as it stands, right now?
What a cogent conclusion.
It would almost appear as if the 47 administration is waiting on circumstances to change with respect to the lawfare battlefield before they make their moves....
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:42 am to CAD703X
They waited until the statute of limitations ran out for Comey. They knew the charges wouldn’t stick, which is why they waited.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:42 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Define lawfare
Why? I didn't use the term.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:43 am to SDVTiger
quote:
I remember when you claimed one of those bougus charges would for sure stick
Well the obstruction case was strong, and wasn't dismissed for substantive reasons, just like how the Comey indictment wasn't dismissed for substantive reasons, either.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:44 am to CAD703X
quote:
What's the point in bondi bringing charges when the entire federal judicial system is going to just going to let them go anyway?
They are only interested when it's Trump.
Here's a little insight to explain your concerns.
Approximately 80% of law professors identify as liberal/progressive, over 70% of lawyers identify as liberal/progressive.
Because of this^^^^ the judiciary is going to lean left and in some cases when politics are front and center the judiciary will lean hard left.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well the obstruction case was strong.
That TDS always shines
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:45 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Approximately 80% of law professors identify as liberal/progressive, over 70% of lawyers identify as liberal/progressive.
What?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:46 am to SlowFlowPro
Just fricking admit for once in your life that everything done to Trump was dirty and political.
Show me on your legal doll all the other presidents who had their personal homes raided and charged with fake crimes
Stop it slow.
Seek help
Show me on your legal doll all the other presidents who had their personal homes raided and charged with fake crimes
Stop it slow.
Seek help
Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:47 am to CAD703X
quote:
Just fricking admit for once in your life that everything done to Trump was dirty and political.
Show me on your legal doll all the other presidents who had their personal homes raided and charged with fake crimes
Stop it slow.
Seek help
The level of cope is just...incredible.

Posted on 1/21/26 at 7:50 am to SlowFlowPro
Nothing he said was false. Everyone knows it but you
Its you who is coping
Its you who is coping
Popular
Back to top


9








