- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Colorado ramps up pressure on Tina Peters
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:08 pm
This is nothing short of Polis and jenna giswold trying to kill this woman before they are forced to set her free
LINK
Last week, former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters’ appeals were heard by a Colorado appellate court. During the hearing, Senior Assistant Attorney General Lisa Michaels was grilled by the judges regarding several issues with Peters’ trial and her sentencing.
Those issues revolved around the failure to articulate a “benefit” for one of her felony charges, an essential element of the charge. Another argument was that the jury was instructed that one charge was a felony but the inclusion of the word “might” was applicable only to a misdemeanor charge, as mentioned in the clip below.
The judges also grilled the sentencing remarks from the trial judge, Matthew Barrett, for considering conduct that was not charged and was not permitted to be presented in her case, specifically regarding whether or not there had been election fraud in Mesa County or Colorado.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. LINK
Last week, former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters’ appeals were heard by a Colorado appellate court. During the hearing, Senior Assistant Attorney General Lisa Michaels was grilled by the judges regarding several issues with Peters’ trial and her sentencing.
Those issues revolved around the failure to articulate a “benefit” for one of her felony charges, an essential element of the charge. Another argument was that the jury was instructed that one charge was a felony but the inclusion of the word “might” was applicable only to a misdemeanor charge, as mentioned in the clip below.
The judges also grilled the sentencing remarks from the trial judge, Matthew Barrett, for considering conduct that was not charged and was not permitted to be presented in her case, specifically regarding whether or not there had been election fraud in Mesa County or Colorado.
This post was edited on 1/19/26 at 4:09 pm
4
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:11 pm to Don Quixote
I want her freed, but how is Colorado being "forced" to release her?
This post was edited on 1/19/26 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:12 pm to Don Quixote
Sure can't free that felon now! /S
This post was edited on 1/19/26 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:13 pm to IvoryBillMatt
aspects of the appellate review last week could result in her case being declared a mistrial
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:14 pm to ItzMe1972
Sounds like she was hit on.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:23 pm to Don Quixote
quote:
aspects of the appellate review last week could result in her case being declared a mistrial
Thanks. At the least, she should have been released on bond pending appeal.
It sounds like they are going to remand for the trial court to consider a reduction in sentence.
Here's what AP reported:
DENVER (AP) — A Colorado appeals panel on Wednesday seemed skeptical that a judge could use former county clerk Tina Peters’ insistence on spreading election conspiracy theories as part of the reason to sentence her to nine years in prison for orchestrating a data breach of election equipment.
The three-judge panel was dismissive of many of the arguments made by Peters’ attorneys. But they grilled the state’s lawyer over the trial judge reciting Peters’ false statements about elections in handing down her sentence.
“The court cannot punish her for her First Amendment rights,” Appeals Judge Craig Welling said.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:27 pm to Don Quixote
Is she guilty of the crime?
I don’t know this sorry. I see she got popped on an election fraud.
Another reason just to break it off when someone comes at you. You have a chance of being charged regardless so you might as well fight.
I don’t know this sorry. I see she got popped on an election fraud.
Another reason just to break it off when someone comes at you. You have a chance of being charged regardless so you might as well fight.
This post was edited on 1/19/26 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:45 pm to jizzle6609
Ok cool, I’ll just go frick myself over here now.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:47 pm to Don Quixote
Just watched the War Room segment with Peter's attorney, the state of CO is claiming Peter's instigated a tussle between her and another inmate. 
Posted on 1/19/26 at 4:49 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
Is she guilty of the crime?
I don’t know this sorry. I see she got popped on an election fraud.
Another reason just to break it off when someone comes at you. You have a chance of being charged regardless so you might as well fight.
Peter's got popped trying to preserve the electronic voting records of a stolen election.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News